iQOO 13 vs Xiaomi 14 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and consistently high performance, the iQOO 13 emerges as the winner. Its 18:03 active use score and Snapdragon 8 Elite’s efficiency provide a more reliable experience. However, the Xiaomi 14 Pro’s significantly faster charging and potentially superior camera system make it a compelling alternative for power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 13 | Xiaomi 14 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 30 | 2023, October 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November 08 | Available. Released 2023, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back or fiber-reinforced plastic back | Glass front, aluminum frame or titanium frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 76.7 x 8 mm (6.43 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) | 161.4 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 207 g or 213 g (7.30 oz) | 223 g or 230 g (7.87 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Alpha | Shatterproof glass |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 2592Hz PWM, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1800 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 5 (China) | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 0.6µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS, 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 28mm (wide), 1/3.15", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes, 360˚ | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PPS, 100% in 30 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 18 min 50W wireless, 100% in 40 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Si/C Li-Ion 6150 mAh (Global)· 6000 mAh (India only) | Li-Po 4880 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Alpha (Black), Nardo Gray (Silver), White (BMW M branding), Ace Green | Black, Silver, Titanium, Green |
| Models | V2408A, I2401 | 23116PN5BC |
| Price | About 590 EUR | About 650 EUR |
vivo iQOO 13
- Exceptional battery life (18:03h active use)
- Snapdragon 8 Elite offers sustained performance
- High peak display brightness (1804 nits)
- Charging speed is slower than Xiaomi 14 Pro
- Lacks wireless charging
Xiaomi 14 Pro
- Ultra-fast 120W wired charging (18 minutes to 100%)
- 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging
- Potentially superior camera system
- Battery life likely shorter than iQOO 13
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 may throttle under sustained load
Display Comparison
The iQOO 13 boasts a display capable of reaching 1804 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Xiaomi 14 Pro’s display specifications aren’t provided, Xiaomi flagships typically employ LTPO panels for adaptive refresh rates, potentially offering power savings. The iQOO 13’s high peak brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor use, while the Xiaomi 14 Pro likely benefits from smoother scrolling and potentially better color accuracy thanks to LTPO technology. Without knowing the Xiaomi 14 Pro’s nits, the iQOO 13 has a clear advantage in measured brightness.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications for both devices are missing. However, Xiaomi flagships are renowned for their camera capabilities, often incorporating large sensors and advanced image processing algorithms. The Xiaomi 14 Pro likely features a more sophisticated camera system with features like variable aperture and advanced computational photography. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to definitively compare, but Xiaomi’s track record suggests a stronger emphasis on camera performance. The iQOO 13, while likely capable, may prioritize other aspects of the user experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO 13 utilizes the Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm), featuring an octa-core configuration with Oryon V2 Phoenix cores clocked up to 4.32 GHz. This architecture is designed for sustained performance and efficiency. The Xiaomi 14 Pro, on the other hand, employs the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) with a more traditional core arrangement, peaking at 3.3 GHz. While the Gen 3 offers impressive peak performance, the 3nm process of the Snapdragon 8 Elite should translate to better thermal management and longer periods of peak performance before throttling. The iQOO 13’s Oryon cores are a key differentiator, promising a different performance profile than the standard Snapdragon.
Battery Life
The iQOO 13 achieves an impressive 18:03 hours of active use, demonstrating excellent battery life. It supports 120W wired charging, reaching 100% in 30 minutes. The Xiaomi 14 Pro also supports 120W wired charging, but achieves a full charge in just 18 minutes – a significant advantage. Furthermore, the Xiaomi 14 Pro adds 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging, offering greater versatility. While the iQOO 13 excels in overall endurance, the Xiaomi 14 Pro’s charging speeds are unmatched, making it ideal for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO 13 if you need exceptional battery endurance for demanding tasks like gaming or content creation, and value sustained performance over peak benchmarks. Buy the Xiaomi 14 Pro if you prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds, a potentially more versatile camera system, and are willing to trade some battery life for that added convenience and feature set.