iQOO 13 vs. Oppo Find X7 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance and all-day battery life, the iQOO 13 emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite and larger battery deliver a noticeable advantage in demanding tasks and longevity. However, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra offers a compelling package with faster charging and a refined user experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 13 | Oppo Find X7 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 30 | 2024, January 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November 08 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back or fiber-reinforced plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 76.7 x 8 mm (6.43 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) | 164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 207 g or 213 g (7.30 oz) | 221 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Alpha | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 2592Hz PWM, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1800 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 5 (China) | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 0.6µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 28mm (wide), 1/3.15", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes, 360˚ | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PPS, 100% in 30 min | 100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Si/C Li-Ion 6150 mAh (Global)· 6000 mAh (India only) | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Alpha (Black), Nardo Gray (Silver), White (BMW M branding), Ace Green | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown |
| Models | V2408A, I2401 | PHY110, PHY120 |
| Price | About 590 EUR | $ 546.64 |
vivo iQOO 13
- Superior CPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Significantly longer battery life
- Faster wired charging (120W)
- Potentially less refined camera system
- Software experience may not be as polished as Oppo
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
- Faster overall charging speed (including wireless)
- Likely superior camera system and image processing
- Potentially more refined software experience
- Shorter battery life
- Less powerful CPU compared to Snapdragon 8 Elite
Display Comparison
The iQOO 13 boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1804 nits compared to the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s 1165 nits. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates (not specified in the data, but standard for this class), the iQOO 13’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage. Bezels and color accuracy are not specified, but both brands typically deliver excellent results in these areas. The brighter panel on the iQOO 13 will benefit users who frequently consume HDR content or work outdoors.
Camera Comparison
The provided data doesn’t detail camera specifications beyond the chipsets’ ISP capabilities. However, Oppo’s Find X series is renowned for its camera prowess, and the ‘Ultra’ designation suggests a sophisticated multi-camera system. The iQOO series, while improving, typically prioritizes performance over camera innovation. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. We can assume both phones will offer excellent image quality, but the Find X7 Ultra likely has an edge in overall camera versatility and image processing sophistication, based on brand reputation.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO 13’s Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) features a unique CPU configuration – 2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L cores and 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M cores – designed for peak performance. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra utilizes the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) with a more conventional octa-core setup (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, etc.). The 3nm process of the Snapdragon 8 Elite should offer improved power efficiency and thermal headroom compared to the 4nm Gen 3, potentially leading to less throttling during extended gaming sessions. While the Gen 3 is a powerful chip, the iQOO 13 is positioned for a performance lead. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the speed isn't specified.
Battery Life
The iQOO 13 demonstrates a significant advantage in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 18:03 hours, compared to the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s 12:47 hours. This difference is likely attributable to the more efficient Snapdragon 8 Elite and potentially a larger battery capacity (not specified). While the Oppo Find X7 Ultra compensates with faster charging – 100% in 26 minutes and 50% in 10 minutes, plus 50W wireless – the iQOO 13’s 120W wired charging (100% in 30 minutes) is still very competitive. The iQOO 13’s longer battery life is crucial for users who frequently travel or engage in prolonged usage without access to a charger.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO 13 if you need uncompromising performance for gaming and power-intensive applications, coupled with exceptional battery life. This phone is for the user who pushes their device to the limit. Buy the Oppo Find X7 Ultra if you prefer a more balanced experience with faster charging capabilities, a potentially more polished software experience (based on Oppo’s historical track record), and don't necessarily need the absolute highest CPU scores.