iQOO 12 vs Redmi K70 Pro: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and all-day battery life, the iQOO 12 edges out the Redmi K70 Pro. Its 13:30-hour active use score provides a tangible advantage, while the shared Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ensures comparable processing power.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 12 | Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, November 07 | 2023, November 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, November 14 | Available. Released 2023, November 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.9 x 8.1 mm or 8.4 mm | 160.9 x 75 x 8.2 mm (6.33 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.5 g or 203.7 g (7.02 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, (ultrawide) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless (market/region dependent) | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 18 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Red, White (BMW M branding) | Black, Silver, Blue/Green, Lamborgini Green, Lamborgini Yellow |
| Models | V2307A | 23117RK66C |
| Price | About 640 EUR | About 430 EUR |
vivo iQOO 12
- Superior battery life (13:30h active use)
- High peak display brightness (1425 nits)
- Potentially better thermal management due to larger chassis
- Camera details are currently unknown
- Software experience may not appeal to all users
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro
- Fastest charging speed (100% in 18 min)
- Wider charger compatibility (PD3.0, QC3+)
- MIUI software ecosystem
- Shorter battery life compared to iQOO 12
- Potential for more aggressive throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both devices are expected to feature high-refresh-rate displays, but the iQOO 12 boasts a measured peak brightness of 1425 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Redmi K70 Pro, which lacks a published brightness figure. While both likely utilize AMOLED technology, the iQOO 12’s higher peak brightness is a significant advantage for outdoor users. The absence of LTPO information for either device suggests potential for higher power consumption at lower refresh rates, impacting battery life.
Camera Comparison
Context data is limited regarding camera capabilities. However, given the market positioning of both brands, we can infer a focus on versatile camera systems. The absence of sensor size or megapixel counts necessitates caution. The Redmi K70 Pro, historically, has leaned towards computational photography, while iQOO often prioritizes natural image processing. Without detailed specifications, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the main sensor would be a crucial differentiator, favoring the device that includes it.
Performance
The core of both phones is the Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm). Critically, both share the *exact same* CPU configuration: 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, and 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520. This means CPU-bound tasks will perform nearly identically. Performance differences will likely stem from thermal management and sustained clock speeds. While both utilize a 4nm process, the iQOO 12’s larger chassis *may* allow for a more effective cooling solution, potentially mitigating throttling during prolonged gaming sessions. RAM specifications are not provided, but both are expected to offer LPDDR5x options for fast memory access.
Battery Life
The iQOO 12’s 13:30-hour active use score is a key differentiator. While the Redmi K70 Pro shares the same 120W wired charging capability, achieving a full charge in a claimed 18 minutes, the iQOO 12’s longer battery life provides a more substantial benefit for users who don’t want to constantly top up. The inclusion of PD3.0 and QC3+ on the Redmi K70 Pro offers broader charger compatibility, but the iQOO 12’s endurance is a more impactful real-world advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO 12 if you need exceptional battery life for demanding daily use, including extended gaming or video consumption. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro if you prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds and appreciate Xiaomi’s MIUI software ecosystem, and are comfortable with potentially slightly shorter battery runtimes.