iQOO 12 vs OnePlus 12R: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and the latest technology, the iQOO 12 is the clear winner. However, the OnePlus 12R delivers a more balanced experience with superior battery endurance and remarkably fast 100W charging, making it ideal for power users who don't want to compromise on longevity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 12 | OnePlus 12R |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, November 07 | 2024, January 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, November 14 | Available. Released 2024, February 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.9 x 8.1 mm or 8.4 mm | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.5 g or 203.7 g (7.02 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless (market/region dependent) | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired | 100W wired, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Red, White (BMW M branding) | Iron Gray, Cool Blue, Electric Violet, Sunset Dune |
| Models | V2307A | CPH2609, CPH2585, CPH2611 |
| Price | About 640 EUR | € 410.84 / $ 399.95 / £ 649.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
vivo iQOO 12
- Latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor for top-tier performance
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Potentially more advanced camera system
- Shorter battery life compared to the OnePlus 12R
- May run hotter under sustained load
OnePlus 12R
- Excellent battery life for all-day use
- Fast 100W charging (full charge in 26 minutes)
- Proven Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Less powerful processor than the iQOO 12
- Dimmer display compared to the iQOO 12
Display Comparison
The iQOO 12 boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1425 nits, compared to the OnePlus 12R’s 1181 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the iQOO 12’s higher peak brightness provides a more vibrant and punchy visual experience. Details regarding refresh rate and panel technology (LTPO) are missing, but both are expected to offer smooth scrolling and efficient power consumption. The difference in brightness will be most noticeable when viewing HDR content.
Camera Comparison
Context data lacks specific camera details for both devices. However, given the iQOO brand’s focus on photography, it’s reasonable to expect a more sophisticated camera system on the iQOO 12, potentially with a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. The OnePlus 12R, while likely capable, will probably prioritize a balanced camera experience rather than pushing the boundaries of mobile photography. Without sensor size or aperture information, a definitive comparison is impossible, but the iQOO 12 is likely to offer more versatility and image quality.
Performance
The iQOO 12’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset represents a significant leap over the OnePlus 12R’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. The 8 Gen 3 features a new CPU architecture with the Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.3 GHz, offering improved single-core performance. The 12R’s Cortex-X3 core, while still powerful, is clocked lower at 3.2 GHz. The iQOO 12’s CPU configuration (1+3+2+2) also suggests a more balanced approach to performance and efficiency. The 4nm process node used by both chips contributes to thermal efficiency, but the newer architecture of the 8 Gen 3 should result in better sustained performance under heavy load. The iQOO 12 will excel in graphically intensive games and demanding applications.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 12R demonstrates a clear advantage in battery life, achieving an active use score of 14:32h, compared to the iQOO 12’s 13:30h. This suggests more efficient power management or a larger battery capacity (data not provided). The 12R also boasts 100W wired charging, reaching 100% charge in just 26 minutes, while the iQOO 12’s 120W charging is faster on paper, the real-world difference may be minimal. The OnePlus 12R’s combination of long battery life and fast charging makes it a more convenient option for users who are frequently on the go.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO 12 if you demand the absolute best performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and are willing to trade some battery life for it. Buy the OnePlus 12R if you prioritize all-day battery life, fast charging, and a consistently smooth experience without necessarily needing the bleeding edge of processing power. It's the pragmatic choice for most users.