vivo iQOO 11 vs vivo X90 Pro+: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO 11 offers blistering charging speeds and top-tier performance at a more competitive price. However, the X90 Pro+ boasts a significantly superior camera system and a more premium design. For camera enthusiasts, the X90 Pro+ is the clear winner, while those seeking value and speed will favor the iQOO 11.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 11 | vivo X90 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - China | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 08 | 2022, November 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 08 | Available. Released 2022, December 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame, eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 164.9 x 77.1 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm | 164.4 x 75.3 x 9.7 mm (6.47 x 2.96 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 205 g or 208 g (7.23 oz) | 221 g (7.80 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | - |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 (International), OriginOS 3 (China) | Android 13, Funtouch (Global), Origin OS 3 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 - 128GB UFS 4.0 - 256/512GB | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50.3 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.4", 0.7µm, AF, 2x optical zoom, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, 14-bit RAW video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 25 min | 80W wired, 100% in 33 min (advertised) 50W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, White (BMW M branding) | Black, Red |
| Models | V2243A | V2227A |
| Price | About 650 EUR | About 1030 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 127h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -26.3 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 1281665 (v9) GeekBench: 4803 (v5.1) GFXBench: 67fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
vivo iQOO 11
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Excellent performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Bright and vibrant display
- Competitive price
- Camera not as impressive as X90 Pro+
- Design less premium than X90 Pro+
vivo X90 Pro+
- Exceptional camera system with 1-inch sensor
- Premium design and build quality
- Fast 80W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Excellent display
- Slower charging than iQOO 11
- Higher price
Display Comparison
Both phones feature stunning 6.78-inch AMOLED displays with 120Hz refresh rates. However, the iQOO 11 boasts a measured peak brightness of 1147 nits, significantly brighter than the X90 Pro+. While the X90 Pro+ has a nominal infinite contrast ratio, the iQOO 11's sheer brightness provides a more impactful viewing experience, especially outdoors. Both offer excellent color accuracy and sharpness.
Camera Comparison
This is where the X90 Pro+ truly shines. It features a 1-inch Sony IMX989 sensor, a 50MP ultrawide, and a 12MP periscope telephoto lens. The iQOO 11 has a capable camera system with a 50MP main sensor, an 8MP ultrawide, and a 12MP telephoto, but it simply can't compete with the X90 Pro+'s image quality, especially in low light. The X90 Pro+ also benefits from vivo's advanced image processing algorithms.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, ensuring flagship-level performance. Real-world usage will feel incredibly smooth on both. The iQOO 11's cooling system might offer a slight edge in sustained performance during intense gaming sessions, but the difference is likely minimal for most users. Software optimization plays a larger role here, and both vivo's Funtouch OS and OriginOS are generally well-regarded.
Battery Life
The iQOO 11 takes a commanding lead in battery charging. Its 120W wired charging can fully charge the phone in just 25 minutes. The X90 Pro+ offers 80W wired charging (33 minutes advertised) and 50W wireless charging, which is still fast but not as impressive as the iQOO 11's wired charging. Both phones have large batteries (around 5000mAh), providing all-day battery life, but the iQOO 11's endurance rating of 127h suggests slightly better overall battery efficiency.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO 11 is ideal for gamers, power users, and anyone who values rapid charging and uncompromising performance. The vivo X90 Pro+ is perfect for photography enthusiasts, content creators, and users who appreciate a luxurious design and a top-of-the-line camera experience.