iQOO 11 Pro vs Poco F5 Pro: The Flagship Killer Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO 11 Pro takes the crown with its significantly faster charging, superior Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset, and generally more premium feel. However, the Poco F5 Pro boasts a brighter display and excellent battery life, making it a compelling alternative for budget-conscious users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 11 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 08 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 21 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm or 9.1 mm | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210.5 g or 213 g (7.44 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 (International), OriginOS 3 (China) | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), PDAF, optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.3, 15mm, 150˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 200W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 10 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min 30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, White (BMW M branding) | Black, White |
| Models | V2254A | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 800 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9) GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO 11 Pro
- Blazing-fast 200W charging
- Superior Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset
- Generally better camera performance
- Premium build quality
- Slightly less impressive battery life than Poco F5 Pro
- Potentially higher price
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (99h endurance rating)
- Brighter display (1059 nits)
- Competitive price
- Good overall performance
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is less powerful than Gen 2
- Slower charging speeds
- Build quality not as premium
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro shines with its measured 1059 nits peak brightness, offering a noticeably more vibrant and visible display, especially outdoors. The iQOO 11 Pro's display is still excellent, but doesn't quite reach the same brightness levels. Both feature high refresh rates for smooth scrolling and gaming.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable camera systems, the iQOO 11 Pro generally produces more detailed and vibrant images, particularly in well-lit conditions. Low-light performance is also slightly better on the iQOO. The Poco F5 Pro's camera is still very good, offering pleasing colors and decent dynamic range.
Performance
The iQOO 11 Pro's Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset provides a significant performance advantage over the Poco F5 Pro's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the iQOO 11 Pro. The Poco F5 Pro is still very capable, but the Gen 2 offers a noticeable boost.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 Pro boasts an impressive endurance rating of 99 hours, indicating exceptional battery life. The iQOO 11 Pro, while still offering good battery life, doesn't quite match the Poco's longevity. However, the iQOO 11 Pro's 200W charging blows the Poco F5 Pro's charging speeds out of the water.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO 11 Pro is ideal for power users, gamers, and those who prioritize blazing-fast charging and top-tier performance. The Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro is a great choice for users seeking a balance of performance, a vibrant display, and exceptional battery life without breaking the bank.