iQOO 10 Pro vs. Poco F5 Pro: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO 10 Pro takes the crown for charging speed, offering an astonishing 200W wired charging. However, the Poco F5 Pro boasts a brighter, more vibrant display and potentially better camera performance. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities: speed or visual fidelity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 10 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 19 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 25 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.9 x 75.5 x 9.5 mm (6.49 x 2.97 x 0.37 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 215.4 g or 216.2 g (7.58 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO3 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 (International), OriginOS Ocean (China) | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 (V6) | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED lash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 14.6 MP, f/2.2, 69mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.3, 15mm, 150˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 200W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 10 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min 30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White (BMW M branding) | Black, White |
| Models | V2218A | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 870 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9) GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO 10 Pro
- Blazing-fast 200W charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Smooth 120Hz display
- Reverse wireless charging
- Potentially less impressive camera
- Design may be less appealing to some
- Battery capacity may be smaller than Poco
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Excellent battery life (99h endurance)
- Versatile camera system (expected)
- Competitive price
- Slower charging speed (67W wired)
- Wireless charging slower than iQOO
- Infinite contrast ratio is nominal and may not translate to significant difference
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro shines with its 1059 nits peak brightness, offering a significantly more vibrant and visible display, especially outdoors. While the iQOO 10 Pro's display is good, it doesn't match the Poco's punch. The Poco's infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent blacks and dynamic range. Both use AMOLED panels with high refresh rates, ensuring smooth scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited in the provided specs. However, based on general knowledge, the Poco F5 Pro is expected to have a more versatile camera system, potentially with a better main sensor and improved image processing. The iQOO 10 Pro's camera is likely competent, but may not offer the same level of detail or dynamic range as the Poco. Further reviews are needed for a definitive comparison.
Performance
Both phones are powered by the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, guaranteeing flagship-level performance. While the CPU clock speeds differ slightly (iQOO 10 Pro has a marginally higher Cortex-X2 clock), real-world performance will be very similar for most tasks. Gaming, multitasking, and demanding apps will run smoothly on both devices. Thermal management will be a key factor in sustained performance, and reviews suggest both handle heat reasonably well.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 Pro claims an impressive 99-hour endurance rating, suggesting excellent battery life. The iQOO 10 Pro's 200W charging compensates for a potentially smaller battery capacity, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups. While the Poco offers longevity, the iQOO provides unmatched convenience when you need a quick charge.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO 10 Pro is ideal for power users who prioritize incredibly fast charging and don't mind a more utilitarian design. The Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro is a great choice for those who value a stunning display, a more balanced feature set, and a slightly more affordable price point.