vivo iQOO 10 Pro vs Xiaomi 12T Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO 10 Pro takes the lead with its blazing-fast 200W charging and potentially more refined software. However, the Xiaomi 12T Pro boasts a brighter display and potentially a more versatile camera system. It's a close call, depending on your priorities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 10 Pro | Xiaomi 12T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 75 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 19 | 2022, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 25 | Available. Released 2022, October 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 164.9 x 75.5 x 9.5 mm (6.49 x 2.97 x 0.37 in) | 163.1 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 215.4 g or 216.2 g (7.58 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO3 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 (International), OriginOS Ocean (China) | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 (V6) | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED lash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 14.6 MP, f/2.2, 69mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.3, 15mm, 150˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 200 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.22", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.47", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | Tuned by Harman Kardon 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 200W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 10 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 120W wired, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White (BMW M branding) | Black, Silver, Blue |
| Models | V2218A | 22081212UG, 22081212G |
| Price | About 870 EUR | $ 208.76 / € 167.62 |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.07 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 91h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.1 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1032185 (v9) GeekBench: 4081 (v5.1) GFXBench: 65fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO 10 Pro
- Blazing-fast 200W charging
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Reverse wireless charging
- Competitive price
- Camera versatility may be limited
- Software experience can be polarizing
- Brightness not officially specified
Xiaomi 12T Pro
- Brighter display (913 nits)
- Excellent battery life (91h endurance)
- Versatile camera system (potentially)
- Strong value for money
- Slower charging (120W)
- Contrast ratio claim is nominal
- Software bloat possible
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent AMOLED displays, but the Xiaomi 12T Pro's measured 913 nits peak brightness gives it an edge in outdoor visibility. The iQOO 10 Pro's display is also excellent, though brightness figures are not readily available. Xiaomi's 'Infinite' contrast ratio is a marketing term, but suggests deep blacks. Expect vibrant colors and smooth scrolling on both.
Camera Comparison
While both phones have capable camera systems, the Xiaomi 12T Pro is generally considered to have a more versatile setup, often including a dedicated telephoto lens (though specifics vary by region). The iQOO 10 Pro's camera is still very good, but may focus more on primary sensor performance. Image processing and video capabilities will differ, requiring a deeper dive into sample photos and videos.
Performance
Powered by the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, both phones deliver flagship-level performance. The iQOO 10 Pro might have a slight edge in sustained performance due to potentially better thermal management, but real-world differences will be minimal for most users. Gaming performance should be excellent on both.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 12T Pro boasts an impressive endurance rating of 91 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. The iQOO 10 Pro's battery capacity is likely smaller, but its 200W charging more than compensates, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups. Wireless charging is also available on both, with the iQOO 10 Pro offering reverse wireless charging.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO 10 Pro is ideal for power users who prioritize charging speed and gaming performance. The Xiaomi 12T Pro is a great choice for those seeking a well-rounded flagship with a strong camera and a vibrant display, especially if value is a key consideration.