vivo iQOO 10 Pro vs. Oppo Find X5 Pro: A Deep Dive into Speed and Sophistication
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing charging speed and raw performance, the vivo iQOO 10 Pro is the clear winner. Its 200W charging is a game-changer, and the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers a slight edge in efficiency. However, the Oppo Find X5 Pro delivers a more balanced package with a potentially superior camera system and a more polished user experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 10 Pro | Oppo Find X5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 19 | 2022, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 25 | Available. Released 2022, March 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.9 x 75.5 x 9.5 mm (6.49 x 2.97 x 0.37 in) | 163.7 x 73.9 x 8.5 or 8.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 215.4 g or 216.2 g (7.58 oz) | 218 g or 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO3 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - GlobalOcta-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - China |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - GlobalMediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) - China |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 - GlobalMali-G710 MC10 - China |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 (International), OriginOS Ocean (China) | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 (V6) | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED lash, HDR, panorama | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 14.6 MP, f/2.2, 69mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.3, 15mm, 150˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS (3-axis sensor-shift, 2-axis lens-shift) 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Oppo Find X5 Pro Dimensity model has no MariSilicon X image chip, 5-axis OIS and Hasselblad’s color calibration | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 200W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 10 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 80W wired, PD, 50% in 12 min 50W wireless, 100% in 47 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White (BMW M branding) | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White, Blue (eco leather) |
| Models | V2218A | PFEM10, CPH2305, PFFM20 |
| Price | About 870 EUR | € 449.00 / $ 430.24 / £ 1,049.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.7 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1012896 (v9) GeekBench: 3433 (v5.1) GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO 10 Pro
- Blazing-fast 200W charging
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers improved efficiency
- Potentially higher sustained performance
- Battery capacity not specified
- Camera details are limited
Oppo Find X5 Pro
- Refined camera system (likely)
- Solid battery life (101h endurance)
- Polished software experience
- Slower charging speed (80W)
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 may throttle under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X5 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 762 nits, suggesting a vibrant and easily viewable display in most conditions. While the iQOO 10 Pro’s display specs aren’t provided, it’s likely to be competitive, but the Find X5 Pro’s contrast ratio is listed as infinite (nominal), indicating excellent black levels. The absence of refresh rate information for the iQOO 10 Pro is a notable omission, but the Find X5 Pro likely benefits from LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, improving battery efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are described as having capable Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. The Oppo Find X5 Pro likely benefits from Oppo’s established image processing pipeline and potentially a larger main sensor. Without sensor size information for the iQOO 10 Pro, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance. The absence of details regarding optical image stabilization (OIS) on either device is a significant gap in the data. The Find X5 Pro’s reputation suggests a more consistent and refined camera experience, while the iQOO 10 Pro may prioritize speed and computational photography.
Performance
The iQOO 10 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm), a refined version of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 found in the Oppo Find X5 Pro (Global variant). The ‘+’ designation signifies improved thermal efficiency and slightly higher clock speeds (3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 vs 3.00 GHz), translating to sustained performance during prolonged gaming sessions. The China variant of the Find X5 Pro uses the MediaTek Dimensity 9000, which offers comparable CPU performance but may differ in GPU capabilities. Both phones feature the same Cortex-A710 and A510 core configuration, but the iQOO 10 Pro’s higher clock speeds give it a marginal advantage. The 4nm fabrication process on both chipsets contributes to improved power efficiency compared to older nodes.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X5 Pro has an endurance rating of 101 hours, indicating solid battery life. The iQOO 10 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, but its defining feature is its 200W wired charging, capable of a full charge in just 10 minutes. This is dramatically faster than the Find X5 Pro’s 80W charging (50% in 12 minutes, 100% in an unspecified time). Both phones offer 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging. The iQOO 10 Pro’s charging speed effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a smaller battery capacity, making it ideal for users who frequently need to top up quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO 10 Pro if you absolutely need the fastest charging available and frequently engage in demanding tasks like gaming. You'll benefit from the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1's sustained performance. Buy the Oppo Find X5 Pro if you value a consistently excellent camera experience, a refined software experience, and a more balanced overall package, even if it means sacrificing the extreme charging speeds of the iQOO.