Umidigi Power 7S vs Xiaomi Poco M5s: A Detailed Comparison for Budget Buyers
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco M5s is the better choice. Its Helio G95 chipset provides significantly improved CPU and GPU performance, making it more capable for gaming and demanding apps. The 33W charging is a massive advantage over the Power 7S’s 10W, offsetting the identical battery endurance ratings.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi Power 7S | Xiaomi Poco M5s |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2022, September 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022 | Available. Released 2022, September 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 169 x 77 x 10 mm (6.65 x 3.03 x 0.39 in) | 160.5 x 74.5 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 216 g (7.62 oz) | 178.8 g (6.31 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1650 pixels (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 106.2 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 450 nits (typ), 700 nits (HBM), 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T310 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8300 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 33W wired, 64% in 30 min |
| Type | 6150 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Reef Gray, Atlantic Blue, Sunbeam Gold | Gray, Blue, White |
| Models | - | 2207117BPG |
| Price | - | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 0.65 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.87 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 132h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.4 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 360681 (v9) GeekBench: 1831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Umidigi Power 7S
- Potentially simpler software experience
- Efficient processor for basic tasks
- Similar battery endurance to Poco M5s
- Significantly slower processor
- Extremely slow 10W charging
- Limited display information
Xiaomi Poco M5s
- Much faster Helio G95 processor
- 33W fast charging (64% in 30 mins)
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Potentially more bloatware
- More power-hungry processor
Display Comparison
The Poco M5s boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 756 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Umidigi Power 7S. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both phones likely utilize IPS LCD panels (given the price point), the Poco M5s’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a more optimized panel for deeper blacks, though this is typical marketing language for IPS. The lack of detailed display specs for the Power 7S makes a precise comparison difficult, but the M5s clearly has the edge in visual clarity.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are missing for the Umidigi Power 7S. The Poco M5s likely benefits from MediaTek’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Helio G95, offering improved image processing capabilities. Without knowing the sensor sizes or apertures on the Power 7S, it’s difficult to assess its camera performance, but the M5s is likely to deliver more consistent and detailed images, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The prevalence of low-resolution macro lenses on both devices suggests they are primarily for marketing purposes and offer limited real-world utility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco M5s’s MediaTek Helio G95 is an octa-core processor featuring two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.05 GHz, alongside six Cortex-A55 cores. This architecture is a substantial upgrade over the Umidigi Power 7S’s Unisoc Tiger T310, which uses a quad-core configuration with a single Cortex-A75 and three Cortex-A55 cores. The G95’s more powerful cores and higher core count will result in noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience. While both are built on a 12nm process, the G95’s architecture is more efficient for sustained performance.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both phones achieve an endurance rating of 132 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the differing chipsets. However, the Poco M5s’s 33W wired charging is a game-changer. It can reach 64% charge in just 30 minutes, while the Umidigi Power 7S is limited to a slow 10W charge. This means the M5s can quickly top up its battery when needed, mitigating any potential battery life differences caused by the more powerful processor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi Power 7S if you prioritize absolute simplicity and minimal software overhead, and your usage is limited to basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. Buy the Xiaomi Poco M5s if you want a phone that can handle more demanding applications, occasional gaming, and benefits from significantly faster charging speeds, even if it means a slightly more complex software experience.