Umidigi Power 7 vs Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and fast charging, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset, coupled with 67W charging, offers a significantly smoother experience and drastically reduces downtime. However, the Umidigi Power 7 remains a viable option for those on an extremely tight budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi Power 7 | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 169 x 77 x 10 mm (6.65 x 3.03 x 0.39 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 216 g (7.62 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1650 pixels (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 106.2 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T610 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MP2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 20 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 6150 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Reef Gray, Atlantic Blue, Sunbeam Gold | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 2201116PG |
| Price | - | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Umidigi Power 7
- Extremely affordable price point
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Acceptable battery endurance (119h)
- Slow 10W charging
- Less powerful Unisoc T610 chipset
- Limited display information
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Fast 67W charging (PD3.0, QC3)
- More powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Likely better camera performance
- Slightly higher price than Umidigi Power 7
- Battery endurance is the same as the Umidigi
- Display details are limited
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing for the Umidigi Power 7. The Poco X4 Pro 5G likely benefits from Xiaomi’s display calibration expertise, potentially offering more accurate colors. Without specific data on the Umidigi, it's difficult to assess its viewing experience beyond basic functionality.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Given the price point, image quality will likely be heavily reliant on software processing. The Poco X4 Pro 5G, benefiting from Qualcomm’s ISP, likely has an edge in image processing. Without sensor size or aperture information for either device, a detailed camera comparison is impossible. It's reasonable to assume the Poco X4 Pro 5G will offer more consistent results due to its superior chipset and likely better software optimization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Umidigi Power 7’s Unisoc T610 (12nm). The 6nm process node inherently provides better power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing the Snapdragon 695 to sustain higher clock speeds for longer. The Snapdragon 695’s CPU, with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores, outperforms the Umidigi’s 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall experience on the Poco X4 Pro 5G. The Unisoc T610 is adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both phones achieve an endurance rating of 119 hours, despite differing charging capabilities. This suggests similar battery optimization and usage patterns were tested. However, the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W wired charging is a game-changer. It can reach 70% charge in just 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes, minimizing downtime. The Umidigi Power 7’s 10W charging is significantly slower, requiring considerably longer to fully replenish the battery. While both may last a similar amount of time on a single charge, the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s charging speed provides a far more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi Power 7 if you need a functional 5G phone with basic capabilities and prioritize absolute affordability above all else. It's ideal for users who primarily use their phone for calls, texts, and light social media. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you prefer a more responsive user experience, faster charging, and are willing to spend a bit more for a noticeable performance boost, making it suitable for casual gaming and multimedia consumption.