Umidigi Power 5S vs Oppo A54s: A Detailed Comparison for Budget Shoppers
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a slightly more modern CPU architecture, the Oppo A54s emerges as the better choice. Its octa-core Helio G35, despite using Cortex-A53 cores, offers a performance advantage over the Umidigi’s quad-core Tiger T310, especially in multi-threaded tasks. However, the Umidigi’s efficiency may translate to slightly better battery life in certain scenarios.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi Power 5S | Oppo A54s |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021. Released 2021 | 2021, October 27 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, November 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.9 x 9.9 mm (6.49 x 3.03 x 0.39 in) | 163.8 x 75.6 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 215 g (7.58 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~81.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T310 (12nm) | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8300 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | Unspecified |
| Internal | 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | eMMC 5.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | 6150 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Carbon Grey, Jade Green, Sapphire Blue | Pearl Blue, Space Silver, Crystal Black |
| Models | - | CPH2273 |
| Price | - | About 170 EUR |
Umidigi Power 5S
- Potentially better battery life due to efficient chipset.
- Unisoc Tiger T310 offers a more modern CPU core (A75).
- Lower price point is likely.
- Quad-core processor may struggle with multitasking.
- Slower 10W charging.
- Limited overall performance.
Oppo A54s
- Octa-core processor provides better multi-tasking capabilities.
- Helio G35 offers a higher clock speed.
- MediaTek ISP may offer slightly improved image processing.
- Cortex-A53 cores are older architecture.
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load.
- May be slightly more expensive.
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given their price points, both likely utilize LCD panels with 720p+ resolutions. The absence of details like peak brightness or color gamut suggests neither phone will excel in outdoor visibility or color accuracy. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both, reflecting their budget nature. Expect a standard 60Hz refresh rate on both devices.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a meaningful comparison is challenging. Both phones likely feature a primary camera alongside auxiliary lenses (potentially a depth or macro sensor). Given the price bracket, image quality will be heavily reliant on software processing. The Oppo, benefiting from MediaTek’s image signal processor (ISP), may offer slightly better image processing capabilities, but this is speculative. The absence of OIS on either device suggests low-light performance will be limited. The usefulness of any 2MP macro lens on either phone is questionable.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A54s’ MediaTek Helio G35 boasts an octa-core configuration (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53), offering more processing threads than the Umidigi Power 5S’ Unisoc Tiger T310 (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55). While the A75 core in the Umidigi is individually more powerful than the A53 cores in the Oppo, the sheer number of cores in the Helio G35 provides a significant advantage in multitasking and applications optimized for multi-threading. The 12nm process node is shared by both, suggesting similar power efficiency characteristics, though the Oppo’s more complex design may draw slightly more power under load. The lack of RAM specifications makes it difficult to assess overall system responsiveness, but both will likely feature 3-4GB of RAM.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Unisoc Tiger T310’s architecture in the Umidigi Power 5S is generally known for its power efficiency. Coupled with the 10W wired charging, the Umidigi may offer longer screen-on time. The Oppo A54s, with its more powerful but potentially less efficient Helio G35, might drain the battery faster under heavy use. The 10W charging on the Umidigi is slower than what is commonly found on Oppo devices, but without knowing the battery capacity, it’s difficult to determine the actual 0-100% charge time difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi Power 5S if you need a phone primarily for basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media use, and value potential longevity through a more power-efficient chipset. Buy the Oppo A54s if you prefer a phone capable of handling slightly more demanding applications, enjoy occasional gaming, and appreciate the benefits of an octa-core processor, even if it's based on older core designs.