Umidigi Power 5 vs. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 860 chipset offers significantly faster performance, crucial for gaming and demanding applications, and its 33W charging dramatically reduces downtime. While the Umidigi Power 5 offers a lower price point, the performance trade-offs are substantial.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi Power 5 | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021. Released 2021 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.9 x 9.9 mm (6.49 x 3.03 x 0.39 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 211 g (7.44 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~81.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G25 (12 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, thermometer (skin temperature) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | 6150 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Carbon Grey, Jade Green, Sapphire Blue | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | - | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | - | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 112h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 453223 (v8) GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1) GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Umidigi Power 5
- Lower price point makes it accessible to budget-conscious users.
- Potentially longer battery life due to efficient chipset (though charging is slow).
- Simple and straightforward user experience.
- Significantly slower performance compared to the Poco X3 Pro.
- Slow 10W charging.
- Limited gaming capabilities.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 860 chipset delivers excellent performance.
- Fast 33W charging significantly reduces downtime.
- Likely superior camera system.
- Higher price point.
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to the Power 5 (though mitigated by fast charging).
- May run slightly warmer under heavy load.
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, the context data lacks detailed display specifications like resolution, refresh rate, and panel type for the Umidigi Power 5. The Poco X3 Pro, while not specified here, typically features a 120Hz display, a significant advantage for smoother scrolling and gaming. Without knowing the Power 5’s refresh rate, it’s safe to assume the Poco X3 Pro offers a more fluid visual experience. The absence of brightness data for the Umidigi Power 5 also makes it difficult to assess its outdoor visibility compared to the Poco X3 Pro.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Given the price difference, it’s reasonable to expect the Poco X3 Pro to have a more capable camera system, potentially with a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing. The Umidigi Power 5 likely relies on software optimization to compensate for potentially lower-quality hardware. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the Poco X3 Pro’s higher overall processing power will likely benefit its camera performance.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7nm) is a significantly more powerful chipset than the Umidigi Power 5’s MediaTek Helio G25 (12nm). The Snapdragon 860’s Kryo 485 cores, with their varying clock speeds (2.96 GHz, 2.42 GHz, and 1.78 GHz), provide a much higher ceiling for sustained performance. The Helio G25’s Cortex-A53 cores, even with an octa-core configuration, are older and less efficient. The 7nm process node of the Snapdragon 860 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended gaming sessions. This translates to a far superior gaming experience and smoother multitasking on the Poco X3 Pro.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 112 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the charging speeds differ dramatically. The Umidigi Power 5’s 10W wired charging is significantly slower than the Poco X3 Pro’s 33W wired charging (59% in 30 minutes, 100% in 59 minutes). This means the Poco X3 Pro can be quickly topped up, minimizing downtime, even if both phones offer similar overall battery endurance. The faster charging is a significant convenience factor for users who frequently use their phones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi Power 5 if you need a very affordable device for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and battery life is paramount over speed. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you prioritize gaming, multitasking, and a smoother overall user experience, and are willing to spend a bit more for significantly improved performance and faster charging.