Umidigi Note 100A vs OnePlus Nord N10 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a slightly brighter display, the OnePlus Nord N10 5G emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 690 offers a noticeable performance edge over the Unisoc T615, and the 30W charging is a significant convenience, despite both phones achieving the same endurance rating.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi Note 100A | OnePlus Nord N10 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 28, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1024/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, February 13 | 2020, October 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, February | Available. Released 2020, November 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 167.8 x 77.4 x 7.7 mm (6.61 x 3.05 x 0.30 in) | 163 x 74.7 x 9 mm (6.42 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~258 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~406 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.49 inches, 101.7 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T615 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 619L |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10, OxygenOS 10.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 256GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.1 |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Rock Black, Interstellar Blue, Lake Green, Starry White | Midnight Ice |
| Models | - | BE2029, BE2025, BE2026, BE2028 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 279579 (v8) GeekBench: 1848 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Umidigi Note 100A
- Potentially lower price point
- 5G connectivity
- Functional for basic tasks
- Less powerful processor
- Slower charging speed
- Unknown display quality
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 690 processor
- 30W fast charging
- Brighter and higher contrast display
- Higher price than Umidigi Note 100A
- May not be significantly better in all camera scenarios
- Software updates may be less frequent than flagship OnePlus models
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord N10 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 440 nits and a 1447:1 contrast ratio, suggesting a more vibrant and visible display, especially outdoors. While the Umidigi Note 100A’s display specifications are not provided, the Nord N10’s higher brightness is a clear advantage for users who frequently consume media in bright environments. The contrast ratio also indicates deeper blacks and more dynamic visuals on the OnePlus device. The absence of refresh rate data for the Umidigi Note 100A suggests it likely operates at the standard 60Hz, while the Nord N10 5G’s 90Hz panel (based on market knowledge) would provide a smoother scrolling experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking for the Umidigi Note 100A. The OnePlus Nord N10 5G likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 690, offering improved image processing and potentially better low-light performance. Without sensor size or aperture information for the Umidigi, it’s difficult to assess its camera capabilities, but the Nord N10 5G’s more established platform suggests a more consistent and reliable camera experience. We can assume the Umidigi will rely heavily on software processing to compensate for potentially less capable hardware.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Umidigi Note 100A utilizes the Unisoc T615 (12nm), while the OnePlus Nord N10 5G features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G (8nm). The Snapdragon 690, built on a smaller 8nm process, generally offers superior CPU and GPU performance. The Snapdragon 690’s Kryo 560 Gold cores, clocked at 2.0 GHz, outperform the Unisoc T615’s Cortex-A75 cores at 1.8 GHz. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Nord N10 5G. The 8nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both the Umidigi Note 100A and the OnePlus Nord N10 5G achieve an endurance rating of 99 hours. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The Nord N10 5G supports 30W wired charging, allowing for a much faster 0-100% charge compared to the Umidigi Note 100A’s 20W charging. While both offer comparable battery life, the convenience of faster charging on the Nord N10 5G is a notable advantage for users who frequently need to top up their devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi Note 100A if you need a functional 5G device on an extremely tight budget and are willing to accept compromises in processing power. Buy the OnePlus Nord N10 5G if you prioritize smoother multitasking, faster charging, and a more refined user experience, even if it means spending a bit more.