Umidigi Note 100 vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a reliable brand, consistent software updates, and a brighter display, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is the better choice. However, the Umidigi Note 100 offers a compelling value proposition for those seeking maximum performance-per-dollar and are comfortable with a less established brand.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi Note 100 | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 39, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, February 13 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, February | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167.8 x 77.4 x 7.7 mm (6.61 x 3.05 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~258 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide), AF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Rock Black, Interstellar Blue, Lake Green, Starry White | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | - | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL |
| Price | $ 106.99 / C$ 152.99 / € 116.99 | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 |
| SAR | - | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9) GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Umidigi Note 100
- Potentially better price-to-performance ratio
- Unisoc T765 offers decent processing power
- Competitive battery endurance
- Less established brand reputation
- Limited software update support
- Display specs are unknown, potentially inferior to A53
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Brighter and more vibrant display (830 nits)
- More powerful Exynos 1280 chipset
- Established brand with reliable software support
- Higher price point
- 25W charging isn't the fastest available
- May not offer the best value for budget-conscious users
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 830 nits, compared to the Umidigi Note 100 (brightness data unavailable). This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Umidigi’s display specs are not provided, the A53’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a Super AMOLED panel, offering superior blacks and vibrant colors. The lack of detailed display information for the Umidigi makes a direct comparison difficult, but the A53’s panel technology and brightness give it a clear advantage for media consumption and outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited for the Umidigi Note 100. The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s established image processing algorithms and potentially features Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on its main sensor (spec not confirmed in provided data). Without sensor size or aperture information for the Umidigi, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance. The A53’s brand reputation suggests a more consistent and refined camera experience, even if it doesn’t boast cutting-edge hardware.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is powered by the Exynos 1280 (5nm), featuring a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A78 cores – than the Umidigi Note 100’s Unisoc T765 (6nm) which utilizes Cortex-A76 cores. While both are octa-core CPUs, the A78 cores in the Exynos 1280 generally offer better single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launching and smoother multitasking. The 5nm process node of the Exynos 1280 also contributes to improved power efficiency compared to the 6nm Unisoc T765, potentially leading to better sustained performance under load. The Umidigi’s Unisoc T765 aims to deliver competitive performance at a lower cost, but the Exynos 1280 holds a clear architectural advantage.
Battery Life
Both the Umidigi Note 100 and Samsung Galaxy A53 5G share an endurance rating of 113 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, charging speeds differ: the Samsung A53 5G supports 25W wired charging, while the Umidigi Note 100 is limited to 20W. This means the A53 5G will likely achieve a faster 0-100% charge time, offering greater convenience. The similar endurance ratings suggest that despite the different charging speeds, both phones offer comparable all-day battery life under typical usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi Note 100 if you need a phone that prioritizes raw processing power for the price, and you're comfortable with potential software quirks and a less-known brand. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G if you prefer a polished user experience, a brighter and more color-accurate display, and the peace of mind that comes with Samsung's established software support and brand reputation.