Umidigi Note 100 vs Oppo Reno7 Lite: A Detailed Comparison for Budget 5G Buyers
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Reno7 Lite emerges as the better choice. While the Umidigi Note 100 boasts a newer chipset, the Reno7 Lite’s optimized Snapdragon 695, coupled with its faster 33W charging and brighter display, provides a smoother and more convenient user experience. The Reno7 Lite’s established brand reputation also adds peace of mind.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi Note 100 | Oppo Reno7 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 39, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, February 13 | 2022, April 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, February | Available. Released 2022, June |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 167.8 x 77.4 x 7.7 mm (6.61 x 3.05 x 0.30 in) | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| - | IPX4, dust and water resistant RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~258 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide), AF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Rock Black, Interstellar Blue, Lake Green, Starry White | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver |
| Models | - | CPH2343 |
| Price | $ 106.99 / C$ 152.99 / € 116.99 | About 350 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 125h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.5 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 315250 (v8), 376819 (v9) GeekBench: 1996 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Umidigi Note 100
- Newer Unisoc T765 chipset
- Potentially lower price point
- 5G connectivity
- Slower 20W charging
- Limited display information
- Less established brand reputation
Oppo Reno7 Lite
- Faster 33W charging with PD
- Brighter display (657 nits)
- Optimized Snapdragon 695 performance
- Older chipset architecture
- Potentially higher price
- No reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno7 Lite features a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 657 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Umidigi Note 100. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays have an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the Reno7 Lite’s superior brightness is a clear advantage. The lack of detailed display specs for the Umidigi, such as refresh rate or panel type, suggests a more basic display experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without information on sensor sizes, apertures, or image processing algorithms, a direct comparison is difficult. However, Oppo generally invests heavily in camera software and image processing, suggesting the Reno7 Lite will likely produce more refined and visually appealing images. The absence of details regarding the Umidigi’s camera system raises concerns about its overall quality. We can assume both phones will include standard features like HDR and portrait modes, but the Reno7 Lite is expected to have a more polished camera experience.
Performance
Both devices utilize 6nm chipsets, but the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 in the Reno7 Lite and the Unisoc T765 in the Note 100 differ in architecture. The Snapdragon 695 employs Kryo 660 Gold and Silver cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 1.7 GHz respectively, while the Unisoc T765 features Cortex-A76 (2.3 GHz) and Cortex-A55 (2.1 GHz) cores. While the Unisoc boasts slightly higher clock speeds on its prime cores, Qualcomm’s Snapdragon typically offers better software optimization and GPU performance. The Reno7 Lite’s Snapdragon 695 is likely to provide a more consistent and smoother experience, particularly in graphically demanding tasks. The Umidigi’s Unisoc T765 is a newer chip, but its real-world performance remains to be seen.
Battery Life
Both the Umidigi Note 100 and Oppo Reno7 Lite achieve an endurance rating of 125 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the Reno7 Lite boasts significantly faster charging at 33W with PD support, achieving 31% charge in 15 minutes and 100% in 63 minutes. The Umidigi Note 100 is limited to 20W charging, meaning a full charge will take considerably longer. The Reno7 Lite also offers reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories. The faster charging speed of the Reno7 Lite is a significant advantage for users who prioritize convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi Note 100 if you prioritize the latest chipset architecture and are comfortable with a potentially less refined software experience. It’s a good option for tech enthusiasts who enjoy tinkering. Buy the Oppo Reno7 Lite if you value a balanced experience with reliable performance, faster charging, a brighter display, and the backing of a well-known brand. It’s ideal for everyday users who want a hassle-free smartphone.