Umidigi Note 100 vs Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025): A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and display quality, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset and 1870 nit display offer a smoother, more vibrant experience. However, the Umidigi Note 100 remains a compelling option for those on a very tight budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi Note 100 | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 39, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, February 13 | 2025, April 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, February | Available. Released 2025, April 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), silicone polymer (eco leather) back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 167.8 x 77.4 x 7.7 mm (6.61 x 3.05 x 0.30 in) | 162.2 x 74.8 x 8.3 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~258 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~444 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide), AF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 68W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Rock Black, Interstellar Blue, Lake Green, Starry White | Pantone: Gibraltar sea, Surf the Web |
| Models | - | XT2517-1 |
| Price | $ 106.99 / C$ 152.99 / € 116.99 | $ 299.99 / C$ 368.17 |
Umidigi Note 100
- Extremely affordable price point
- Functional and reliable for basic tasks
- Unisoc T765 offers decent efficiency
- Significantly slower performance than the Motorola
- Likely a dimmer and lower-quality display
- Slow 20W charging
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)
- Faster Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 processor
- Exceptionally bright 1870 nit display
- 68W wired and 15W wireless charging
- Higher price compared to the Umidigi Note 100
- Stylus may not be useful for all users
- Software updates may be less frequent than some competitors
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1870 nits. This is a substantial advantage over what we'd expect from the Umidigi Note 100, making the Motorola far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Umidigi's display specs are not provided, it's likely to be considerably dimmer. The Motorola's brightness also suggests a higher-quality panel, potentially with better color accuracy and viewing angles. The lack of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rate will likely be fixed, impacting smoothness compared to flagship phones.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Umidigi Note 100, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, offering improved image processing capabilities. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests both rely on software stabilization, which is less effective in low-light conditions. We can assume both phones will include a standard wide and ultrawide lens, but the Motorola's ISP will likely provide better dynamic range and noise reduction.
Performance
The Motorola’s Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4nm) represents a significant leap in performance and efficiency over the Umidigi’s Unisoc T765 (6nm). The Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 utilizes Cortex-A78 cores (2.4 GHz) which are architecturally superior to the Cortex-A76 cores (2.3 GHz) found in the Unisoc chip. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon also contributes to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Motorola’s configuration is optimized for more demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) delivers a compelling battery life, achieving 10:05 hours of active use. While the Umidigi Note 100’s battery capacity is unknown, the Motorola’s advantage is further solidified by its significantly faster charging capabilities. 68W wired charging and 15W wireless charging on the Motorola drastically reduce downtime compared to the Umidigi’s 20W wired charging. This means the Motorola can be rapidly topped up during short breaks, while the Umidigi will require considerably longer to reach a full charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi Note 100 if you need a functional smartphone with basic features and are prioritizing the absolute lowest price. It's ideal for users who primarily use their phone for calls, texts, and light social media. Buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) if you prefer a more responsive experience, a brighter and more usable display in sunlight, faster charging, and the added utility of a built-in stylus for note-taking and creative tasks.