The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Umidigi Note 100 4G and Xiaomi Redmi 10C represent compelling options, but cater to slightly different priorities. The Umidigi emphasizes faster charging, while the Redmi 10C leverages Qualcomm's Snapdragon platform for potentially smoother performance. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and efficient power usage, the Xiaomi Redmi 10C emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 680, built on a 6nm process, offers a noticeable advantage in both CPU and GPU performance compared to the Umidigi Note 100 4G's Unisoc T615, despite the latter's faster charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, October | 2022, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 167.8 x 77.4 x 7.7 mm (6.61 x 3.05 x 0.30 in) | 169.6 x 76.6 x 8.3 mm (6.68 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~258 ppi density) | 720 x 1650 pixels (~268 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.71 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T615 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide), AF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Rock Black, Interstellar Blue, Starry White | Graphite Gray, Ocean Blue, Mint Green |
| Models | - | 220333QAG, 220333QBI, 220333QNY, 220333QL |
| Price | - | £ 99.00 / € 109.86 |
| SAR | - | 0.96 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
Umidigi Note 100 4G
- Faster 20W wired charging
- Potentially lower price point (depending on retailer)
- May offer more RAM/storage configurations
- Less efficient Unisoc T615 chipset
- Likely lower sustained performance
- Potentially inferior camera image processing
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
- More efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset (6nm)
- Better CPU and GPU performance
- Qualcomm ISP for improved camera processing
- Slower 18W wired charging
- May be slightly more expensive
- Potentially less RAM/storage for the price
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this price bracket. However, details like peak brightness and color gamut are missing. The focus here is on the internals. The Redmi 10C's display is likely optimized for power efficiency alongside the Snapdragon 680, while the Umidigi's display specs are unknown, making it difficult to assess its visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is challenging. Both phones likely feature a primary camera accompanied by auxiliary lenses (often 2MP macro/depth sensors of limited utility). The Redmi 10C benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), which generally delivers better image processing and noise reduction compared to Unisoc’s ISP. The Snapdragon 680’s ISP is optimized for computational photography, potentially resulting in more detailed and vibrant photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The Umidigi's camera performance is likely more basic.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi 10C’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm) is a significant step up from the Umidigi Note 100 4G’s Unisoc T615 (12nm). The 6nm process inherently provides better power efficiency and thermal characteristics, meaning the Redmi 10C will likely sustain peak performance for longer periods without throttling. The Snapdragon 680’s CPU configuration – 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver – also offers a higher clock speed advantage over the Unisoc T615’s 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking on the Redmi 10C.
Battery Life
The Redmi 10C’s Snapdragon 680’s efficiency is key here. While the Umidigi Note 100 4G offers 20W charging, potentially achieving a faster 0-100% charge time than the Redmi 10C’s 18W, the Redmi 10C will likely provide longer overall battery life due to the more efficient chipset. The 6nm process reduces power consumption during both active use and standby, meaning users will likely need to charge the Redmi 10C less frequently, even with a potentially smaller battery capacity (spec not provided).
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi Note 100 4G if you absolutely prioritize minimizing charging times and frequently top up your phone throughout the day. Its 20W charging is a clear advantage. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 10C if you value sustained performance for everyday tasks, light gaming, and longer battery life between charges, benefiting from the more efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 680 in the Redmi 10C handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 680 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but likely at medium settings to maintain a stable frame rate. It's not a gaming powerhouse, but it offers a playable experience for casual gamers. The Unisoc T615 in the Umidigi Note 100 4G will likely struggle with consistent performance in PUBG Mobile, requiring lower settings and potentially experiencing frame drops.
❓ How much faster is the 20W charging on the Umidigi Note 100 4G compared to the Redmi 10C's 18W charging?
While 20W is numerically faster, the difference in real-world charging time may not be dramatic. Expect the Umidigi Note 100 4G to charge slightly quicker, potentially shaving off 15-30 minutes for a full charge, but the Redmi 10C's superior battery efficiency means you'll likely be charging it less often overall.
❓ Does the Redmi 10C support VoLTE and VoWiFi for improved call quality?
Support for VoLTE and VoWiFi varies by region and carrier. It's crucial to check compatibility with your specific mobile network provider before purchasing either device. Xiaomi generally offers good carrier support, but it's always best to confirm.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone worth using?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on budget phones offer limited utility. Image quality is often poor, lacking detail and sharpness. They are more of a marketing feature than a genuinely useful camera tool. Don't base your purchasing decision on the presence of a 2MP macro lens.
