Poco X6 Pro vs Umidigi G9T: A Detailed Comparison of Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset offers a substantial leap in processing power and gaming capabilities compared to the Umidigi G9T’s Unisoc T606. However, the G9T remains a viable option for those on a very tight budget who prioritize basic functionality.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi G9T | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 167.2 x 77 x 7.9 mm (6.58 x 3.03 x 0.31 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Rock Black, Grass Green | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | - | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | - | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Umidigi G9T
- Excellent value for money
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Affordable price point
- Weak performance for demanding apps
- Likely subpar camera quality
- Slow charging speed
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Flagship-level performance with Dimensity 8300 Ultra
- Fast 67W charging
- Bright and likely high-refresh-rate display
- Higher price point
- May be overkill for basic users
- Details on camera specs are limited
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1148 nits, making it easily viewable outdoors. While the Umidigi G9T’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be considerably dimmer. This difference in brightness impacts usability in direct sunlight. The X6 Pro’s panel likely utilizes a higher refresh rate (though not specified) contributing to smoother scrolling and animations, a feature likely absent on the G9T. The X6 Pro’s superior brightness and likely higher refresh rate translate to a more immersive and enjoyable viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
The context data for the Umidigi G9T’s camera is limited, but given its price point, it’s reasonable to assume a basic camera setup. The Poco X6 Pro, while details are sparse, is positioned as a multimedia-focused device, suggesting a more capable camera system. The X6 Pro likely features a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. While the G9T may suffice for casual snapshots, the X6 Pro is expected to deliver superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of details on OIS or advanced features on the G9T further highlights the X6 Pro’s potential advantage.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) is a flagship-adjacent chipset featuring an octa-core configuration with a prime Cortex-A715 core clocked at 3.35 GHz, alongside three additional Cortex-A715 cores and four efficiency cores. This contrasts sharply with the Umidigi G9T’s Unisoc T606 (12nm), which utilizes older Cortex-A75 and A55 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 8300 Ultra offers significantly improved power efficiency and thermal management, allowing for sustained peak performance. The X6 Pro will excel in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, while the G9T will struggle with anything beyond basic app usage.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro demonstrates impressive battery life, achieving 11:46h of active use. While the Umidigi G9T’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its less power-hungry chipset suggests reasonable endurance for basic tasks. However, the X6 Pro’s 67W wired charging, supporting QC2.0 and PD3.0, and achieving a full charge in just 45 minutes, is a significant advantage. The G9T’s 18W charging is considerably slower, requiring more time to replenish the battery. The X6 Pro’s faster charging is crucial for users who need to quickly top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi G9T if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and your budget is under $150. You’ll accept compromises in performance and camera quality. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and a smoother overall user experience, and are willing to spend around $300-$400. You’ll benefit from significantly faster processing speeds, a brighter display, and quicker charging.