Umidigi G9T vs Samsung Galaxy A55: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smooth, responsive experience and a brighter, more vibrant display, the Samsung Galaxy A55 is the clear winner. Its Exynos 1480 chipset and superior battery life justify the price premium. However, the Umidigi G9T remains a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers who prioritize affordability above all else.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi G9T | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 167.2 x 77 x 7.9 mm (6.58 x 3.03 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Rock Black, Grass Green | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | - | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | - | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
Umidigi G9T
- Significantly more affordable
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Potentially expandable storage (microSD slot likely)
- Substantially slower performance
- Lower quality display
- Inferior camera system
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Excellent performance with Exynos 1480
- Bright and vibrant Super AMOLED display
- Long battery life and faster charging
- Higher price point
- May lack a headphone jack (depending on region)
- Software bloatware (typical of Samsung)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A55 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1010 nits, compared to an assumed lower peak brightness on the Umidigi G9T (typical of its price bracket). This difference translates to vastly improved visibility in direct sunlight. While the G9T’s panel specifications are unknown, the A55’s likely utilizes Super AMOLED technology, offering superior contrast and color accuracy. The A55’s display is a key advantage for media consumption and outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for the Umidigi G9T, a direct comparison is limited. However, Samsung typically prioritizes camera performance in its A-series. The A55 likely features a more sophisticated image processing pipeline and potentially larger sensor sizes, resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range. While the G9T may offer acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions, the A55 is expected to deliver consistently superior results, especially in challenging scenarios. We can assume the G9T will include lower resolution sensors and lack features like Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) found on many A55 configurations.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Samsung Galaxy A55’s Exynos 1480, built on a 4nm process, features four Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.75 GHz, offering a significant leap in CPU performance over the Umidigi G9T’s Unisoc T606. The T606, with its 12nm process and older Cortex-A75 cores peaking at 1.6 GHz, is geared towards efficiency rather than raw power. This means the A55 will handle demanding apps, multitasking, and gaming with greater ease, while the G9T may exhibit noticeable lag in resource-intensive scenarios. The A55 also benefits from potentially faster RAM (likely LPDDR5x) compared to the G9T.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A55 demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving 13 hours and 27 minutes of active use. While the Umidigi G9T’s battery capacity is unknown, its less efficient Unisoc T606 chipset and slower 18W charging will likely result in shorter runtimes and longer charging times. The A55’s 25W charging, while not the fastest available, provides a quicker top-up compared to the G9T’s 18W solution. The A55’s more efficient processor allows it to extract more usage from its battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi G9T if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks – calls, texts, social media – and are unwilling to spend more than $200. It’s ideal for users who don’t heavily game or rely on demanding apps. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prefer a more refined user experience, better performance for gaming and multitasking, a significantly brighter display for outdoor visibility, and the peace of mind that comes with Samsung’s software support and build quality.