Umidigi G5A vs. Infinix Smart 7 HD: A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Performance

The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. Both the Umidigi G5A and the Infinix Smart 7 HD aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an incredibly affordable price point. However, they take different approaches to achieving this, with the G5A prioritizing a newer, albeit still entry-level, chipset while the Smart 7 HD opts for an octa-core CPU configuration. This comparison will dissect the key differences to determine which device offers the best value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and future-proofing, the Umidigi G5A is the better choice. While both phones share the same slow 10W charging, the G5A’s Mediatek Helio A22, despite its lower clock speed, benefits from architectural improvements over the Smart 7 HD’s CPU, resulting in a smoother user experience.

PHONES
Phone Names Umidigi G5A Infinix Smart 7 HD
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 661, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
 -1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41
Launch
Announced20232023, April 14
StatusAvailable. Released 2023Available. Released 2023, April 14
Body
Build-Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions163.9 x 75.7 x 8.8 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in)163.9 x 75.5 x 8.7 mm (6.45 x 2.97 x 0.34 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight195 g (6.88 oz)196.5 g (6.95 oz)
Display
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density)720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density)
Size6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio)6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD, 500 nits
Platform
CPUQuad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53Octa-core 1.6 GHz
ChipsetMediatek Helio A22 (12 nm)-
GPUPowerVR GE8320-
OSAndroid 13Android 12 (Go edition)
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal64GB 4GB RAM64GB 2GB RAM
 -UFS 2.1
Main Camera
Dual13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF Auxiliary lens8 MP, f/2.0 0.08 MP, (depth)
FeaturesLED flashDual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Single-8 MP, f/2.0 Auxiliary lens
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Features-LED flash
Single5 MP, f/2.0, (wide)5 MP, f/2.0
Video720p@30fps720p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -Yes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS
RadioFM radioFM radio
USBUSB Type-CmicroUSB 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/acWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity
Battery
Charging10W wired10W wired
Type5000 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsGraphite Black, Jade Green, Lavender Purple, Pearl White, Space GrayInk Black, Silk Blue, Jade White, Green Apple
Models-X6516
PriceAbout 100 EURAbout 110 EUR

Umidigi G5A

  • More modern chipset architecture (Helio A22)
  • Potentially better power efficiency
  • Smoother responsiveness in everyday tasks

  • Limited RAM (likely)
  • Slow 10W charging

Infinix Smart 7 HD

  • Octa-core CPU for potential multitasking benefits
  • Very affordable price point
  • Potentially wider app compatibility

  • Less efficient CPU architecture
  • Slower performance in single-core tasks
  • Slow 10W charging

Display Comparison

Neither Umidigi nor Infinix provide display specifications beyond size. Given the price bracket, both likely utilize LCD panels with 720p+ resolution. The absence of details like peak brightness or color gamut suggests neither phone excels in display quality. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, impacting the overall screen-to-body ratio. Color accuracy will likely be standard for this segment, prioritizing power efficiency over fidelity.

Camera Comparison

Camera details are sparse for both devices. It’s safe to assume both feature a primary camera and potentially a secondary depth sensor. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the price point, image quality will be heavily reliant on software processing. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests low-light performance will be limited. Any marketing around megapixel counts should be viewed with skepticism, as sensor size and image processing are far more important than resolution alone.

Performance

The core difference lies in the processors. The Umidigi G5A features a Mediatek Helio A22 (12 nm), a quad-core processor built on a more modern 12nm process. This process node generally translates to better power efficiency compared to the older process likely used in the Infinix Smart 7 HD. The Smart 7 HD boasts an octa-core CPU clocked at 1.6 GHz. While more cores *can* improve multitasking, the Cortex-A53 cores in the G5A are more efficient per core. The Helio A22’s architecture provides a performance advantage in single-core tasks, which are crucial for app launch times and general responsiveness. The Smart 7 HD’s octa-core setup may show marginal gains in heavily multi-threaded applications, but these are unlikely to be common on these devices. RAM configurations are not specified, but both will likely be limited, further emphasizing the importance of efficient CPU architecture.

Battery Life

Both the Umidigi G5A and the Infinix Smart 7 HD are equipped with 10W wired charging. This is a significant limitation, meaning a full charge will take a considerable amount of time – likely exceeding 3 hours. Battery capacity is not specified, but both will likely feature batteries in the 4000-5000 mAh range to provide all-day battery life with moderate usage. The Helio A22’s power efficiency in the G5A may translate to slightly longer battery life, offsetting any potential capacity differences.

Buying Guide

Buy the Umidigi G5A if you need a phone that feels more responsive for everyday tasks like browsing and social media, and if you value a slightly more modern chipset architecture. Buy the Infinix Smart 7 HD if you prioritize a potentially wider app compatibility due to the octa-core CPU, and if you are looking for the absolute lowest possible price point, accepting some performance trade-offs.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Infinix Smart 7 HD struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
While the Smart 7 HD can run these apps, the octa-core CPU’s older architecture may result in slower loading times and occasional lag, especially with multiple apps open. The Umidigi G5A’s Helio A22 is likely to provide a smoother experience for these common tasks.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge either phone from 0%?
With both phones limited to 10W charging, expect a full charge to take approximately 3 to 4 hours. This is a significant drawback for users who need quick top-ups.
❓ Is the camera on either phone good enough for casual social media photos?
Both cameras will be adequate for basic social media sharing in good lighting conditions. However, expect limited detail and dynamic range, especially in low-light environments. Don't expect flagship-level image quality.
❓ Can either phone handle basic mobile games?
Both phones can handle less demanding 2D games. However, graphically intensive 3D games will likely experience significant lag and low frame rates. The Helio A22 in the G5A may offer slightly better performance in some games, but neither phone is designed for serious gaming.