The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Umidigi G3 Plus and Oppo A58 4G both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches. The G3 Plus focuses on a streamlined experience, while the A58 4G prioritizes faster charging and a slightly more powerful chipset. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo A58 4G is the better choice. Its Mediatek Helio G85 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge over the Umidigi G3 Plus’s Unisoc T606, and the 33W charging is a game-changer for convenience. While the G3 Plus is cheaper, the A58 4G’s benefits justify the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2023, July 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023 | Available. Released 2023, July 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.7 x 8.8 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 165.7 x 76 x 8 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G85 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 33W wired, 56% in 30 min |
| Type | 5150 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Graphite Black, Dark Green, Lavender Purple | Glowing Black, Dazzling Green |
| Models | - | CPH2577 |
| Price | - | About 150 EUR |
Umidigi G3 Plus
- Lower price point makes it very accessible.
- Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks.
- Likely longer battery life due to less demanding chipset.
- Significantly slower performance compared to the Oppo A58 4G.
- Extremely slow 10W charging.
- Limited gaming capabilities.
Oppo A58 4G
- Faster and more responsive performance thanks to the Helio G85.
- 33W fast charging dramatically reduces charging time.
- Better suited for gaming and multitasking.
- Slightly higher price compared to the Umidigi G3 Plus.
- May experience more battery drain due to the more powerful chipset.
- Camera performance likely relies heavily on software processing.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both utilize 12nm chipsets, suggesting similar power constraints impacting display capabilities. While specific display specs (resolution, panel type) are missing, the focus here is on performance. The lack of high refresh rates on either device indicates a prioritization of battery life over visual fluidity. Bezels are likely comparable given the price bracket, and color accuracy is expected to be standard for this segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both phones will rely heavily on software processing to enhance image quality. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device means low-light performance will be limited. The primary sensor size is crucial, but lacking that data, we can assume both will feature sensors adequate for social media sharing but not professional photography. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering minimal practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A58 4G’s Mediatek Helio G85, with its 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores, offers a clear advantage over the Umidigi G3 Plus’s Unisoc T606 (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75). The higher clock speeds on the A58 4G translate to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. While both use the same Cortex-A75 architecture for peak performance, the G85’s higher frequency provides a tangible boost. The A58 4G will handle graphically demanding games with more ease, and the difference will be noticeable in everyday use. Both devices likely feature similar RAM configurations, but the chipset is the bottleneck.
Battery Life
The Oppo A58 4G’s 33W charging is a significant advantage. The ability to reach 56% charge in just 30 minutes drastically reduces downtime compared to the Umidigi G3 Plus’s slow 10W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed effectively mitigates any potential capacity difference. Users who frequently find themselves needing a quick top-up will greatly appreciate the A58 4G’s charging capabilities. The G3 Plus will require significantly longer to fully charge, making it less convenient for on-the-go users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi G3 Plus if you prioritize absolute affordability and are willing to compromise on performance and charging speed. It’s a solid option for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Oppo A58 4G if you value faster performance for gaming and multitasking, and appreciate the convenience of significantly faster 33W charging. It’s ideal for users who want a more responsive experience without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G85 in the Oppo A58 4G struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
While the Helio G85 isn't a flagship gaming chip, it's capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. Expect some occasional frame drops during intense action, but it's a playable experience. The Umidigi G3 Plus, with its Unisoc T606, will struggle significantly more with these titles.
❓ How long will it realistically take to fully charge the Umidigi G3 Plus with its 10W charging?
Given the 10W charging rate, a full charge from 0% on the Umidigi G3 Plus will likely take between 3 to 4 hours, potentially even longer depending on battery capacity. This is a significant drawback compared to the Oppo A58 4G’s 33W fast charging.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Unisoc T606 and Helio G85 noticeable in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. The Helio G85’s higher clock speeds and more efficient architecture result in snappier app launches, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive overall experience. While the Unisoc T606 is adequate for basic tasks, the Helio G85 provides a more fluid and enjoyable user experience.
