Umidigi G2 vs. Realme C67 4G: A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Performance

The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Umidigi G2, powered by the Mediatek Helio A22, represents a value-focused approach, while the Realme C67 4G, with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, aims for a balance of performance and features. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you choose the right device.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Realme C67 4G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 685 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, delivers significantly better performance and responsiveness than the Umidigi G2’s Helio A22. The 33W charging is a game-changer, drastically reducing charge times compared to the G2’s 10W.

PHONES
Phone Names Umidigi G2 Realme C67 4G
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 661, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced20232023, December 19
StatusAvailable. Released 2023Available. Released 2023, December 19
Body
Dimensions163.9 x 75.7 x 8.8 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in)164.6 x 75.4 x 7.6 mm (6.48 x 2.97 x 0.30 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight192 g (6.77 oz)185 g (6.53 oz)
Display
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density)
Size6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio)6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~87.8% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD, 90Hz, 800 nits (typ), 950 nits (HBM)
Platform
CPUQuad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53)
ChipsetMediatek Helio A22 (12 nm)Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8320Adreno 610
OSAndroid 13Android 14, Realme UI
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal32GB 3GB RAM128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
Main Camera
Dual13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF Auxiliary lens108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens
FeaturesDual-LED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
Single5 MP, f/2.0, (wide)8 MP, f/2.1, (wide)
Video720p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCNoYes, 360˚
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEOGPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS
RadioNoUnspecified
USBUSB Type-C, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging10W wired33W wired
Type5150 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsGraphite Black, Dawn GoldSunny Oasis, Black Rock
Models-RMX3890
Price-About 160 EUR

Umidigi G2

  • Extremely affordable price point
  • Functional for basic smartphone tasks
  • Simple and straightforward user experience

  • Slow performance due to Helio A22 chipset
  • Outdated 12nm process technology
  • Slow 10W charging

Realme C67 4G

  • Significantly faster performance with Snapdragon 685
  • More efficient 6nm process for better battery life
  • 33W fast charging for quicker top-ups

  • Potentially higher price than the Umidigi G2
  • May still lack advanced features found in higher-end phones
  • Display details are currently unknown

Display Comparison

Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific display specs (resolution, panel type) are missing for the Umidigi G2, it’s likely a basic LCD panel. The Realme C67 4G’s display details are also absent, but Realme typically uses IPS LCDs in this segment. The key differentiator will be color accuracy and brightness, which are difficult to assess without testing. However, the Realme’s more recent release suggests a potentially improved panel.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the chipset plays a role in image processing capabilities. The Snapdragon 685’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is more advanced than the Helio A22’s, enabling better noise reduction, dynamic range, and overall image quality. While both phones likely feature a primary camera and potentially a depth sensor, the Realme C67 4G will likely produce more detailed and vibrant photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of OIS on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization.

Performance

The performance gap is substantial. The Realme C67 4G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, fabricated on a 6nm process, is a clear upgrade over the Umidigi G2’s 12nm Mediatek Helio A22. The Snapdragon 685 features an octa-core configuration (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) compared to the G2’s quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53. This translates to significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface. The architectural advantage of the A73 cores in the Snapdragon 685 provides a noticeable boost in single-core performance, crucial for everyday tasks. Gaming performance will be dramatically better on the Realme C67 4G.

Battery Life

The Realme C67 4G’s 33W wired charging is a major advantage. This will significantly reduce charging times compared to the Umidigi G2’s slow 10W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging of the Realme C67 4G effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage. Users will spend less time tethered to a charger, a crucial benefit for on-the-go lifestyles.

Buying Guide

Buy the Umidigi G2 if you prioritize extreme affordability and only need a phone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. It’s a functional device for those on a very tight budget. Buy the Realme C67 4G if you value a smoother user experience, faster charging, and the ability to handle more demanding apps and occasional gaming. It’s a worthwhile investment for anyone seeking a more capable daily driver.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Snapdragon 685 in the Realme C67 4G handle popular games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 685 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but likely at medium settings to maintain a stable frame rate. While not a gaming powerhouse, it offers a significantly better gaming experience than the Helio A22 in the Umidigi G2, which would struggle with even lower settings.
❓ Is the 10W charging on the Umidigi G2 realistically usable for daily charging?
10W charging is quite slow by today's standards. Expect a full charge to take several hours, making it less convenient for users who need to quickly top up their battery throughout the day. It's best suited for overnight charging.
❓ How much of a difference will the 6nm process of the Snapdragon 685 make in real-world battery life?
The 6nm process is significantly more power-efficient than the 12nm process used in the Helio A22. This translates to longer battery life for the Realme C67 4G, even with similar battery capacity, as the chipset consumes less power during operation.
❓ Are there any known thermal throttling issues with the Snapdragon 685 under sustained load?
The Snapdragon 685 generally handles thermal management well for its class. While some throttling may occur during prolonged gaming sessions, it's typically not severe enough to significantly impact performance. The 6nm process contributes to better thermal efficiency compared to older, larger node chipsets.