The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Umidigi G1 Plus and Oppo A58 4G both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, but they take drastically different approaches to achieving this. The G1 Plus prioritizes a lower entry cost, while the A58 4G focuses on a more modern chipset and faster charging capabilities. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and future-proofing, the Oppo A58 4G is the clear winner. Its Helio G85 chipset and 33W charging significantly outperform the Umidigi G1 Plus’s older Mediatek MT8766 and 10W charging, justifying a potential price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2023, July 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023 | Available. Released 2023, July 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.7 x 8.8 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 165.7 x 76 x 8 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8766 | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G85 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8300 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual-LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 33W wired, 56% in 30 min |
| Type | 5150 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Starry Black, Galaxy Blue | Glowing Black, Dazzling Green |
| Models | - | CPH2577 |
| Price | - | About 150 EUR |
Umidigi G1 Plus
- Lowest possible price point
- Functional for basic tasks
- May have longer battery life due to slower processor
- Significantly slower performance
- Extremely slow charging
- Outdated chipset
Oppo A58 4G
- Faster and more responsive performance
- 33W fast charging
- More modern chipset (Helio G85)
- Potentially higher price
- May have slightly shorter battery life (offset by fast charging)
- Software updates may be limited
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the A58 4G’s positioning, it likely features a higher resolution and potentially better color accuracy than the G1 Plus. The G1 Plus, aiming for cost reduction, may utilize a lower-quality panel. Bezels are also likely to be more prominent on the G1 Plus. Without specific data, it’s reasonable to assume the A58 4G offers a more visually pleasing experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, it’s common for budget phones to prioritize megapixel count over sensor size and image quality. We can assume the Oppo A58 4G, being a newer device, likely features a more capable main sensor and potentially better image processing algorithms. The Umidigi G1 Plus likely relies on older, less sophisticated camera technology. The presence or absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is unknown for both, but unlikely on the G1 Plus given its price point. Any 2MP macro or depth sensors on either device should be considered marketing features with limited real-world utility.
Performance
The performance disparity is significant. The Oppo A58 4G’s Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm) is an octa-core processor featuring two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 1.8 GHz. This architecture provides a substantial performance boost over the Umidigi G1 Plus’s quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 processor based on the Mediatek MT8766. The Helio G85’s more modern architecture and higher clock speeds translate to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The 12nm process node also contributes to better power efficiency compared to the likely larger node used in the MT8766. Users who play demanding games or frequently switch between apps will notice a considerable difference.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Oppo A58 4G’s 33W wired charging is a major advantage. The ability to charge to 56% in just 30 minutes significantly reduces downtime compared to the Umidigi G1 Plus’s slow 10W charging. While the G1 Plus might have a slightly larger battery capacity, the A58 4G’s faster charging effectively mitigates any potential battery life disadvantage. Users who frequently find themselves needing to top up their phone will greatly appreciate the A58 4G’s charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi G1 Plus if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light web browsing, and your budget is extremely limited. It’s a viable option for those who prioritize absolute affordability over performance. Buy the Oppo A58 4G if you prefer a smoother user experience, enjoy occasional mobile gaming, and value the convenience of fast charging. It’s the better choice for users who want a phone that will remain usable for longer.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G85 in the Oppo A58 4G handle popular games like PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile?
The Helio G85 is capable of running PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. While it won't deliver a flagship gaming experience, it provides a playable experience for casual gamers. The Umidigi G1 Plus’s MT8766 will struggle with these titles, likely requiring very low settings and experiencing significant lag.
❓ How much slower is the 10W charging on the Umidigi G1 Plus compared to the 33W charging on the Oppo A58 4G in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Oppo A58 4G can gain 56% charge in 30 minutes, meaning a full charge will take around an hour. The Umidigi G1 Plus’s 10W charging will likely take over 3 hours to fully charge, making it inconvenient for users who need a quick top-up.
❓ Is the difference in processor performance between the MT8766 and Helio G85 noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the difference is quite noticeable. The Helio G85’s octa-core architecture and higher clock speeds result in snappier app launches, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive overall user experience. The MT8766 will feel sluggish in comparison, especially when multitasking.
