Umidigi F3 vs Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro: A Detailed Comparison for Budget Buyers
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro is the better choice. Its Helio G96 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Umidigi F3’s Helio P70, and the significantly faster 33W charging – completing a full charge in just 58 minutes – is a major convenience. While both phones offer similar battery endurance ratings, the Poco M4 Pro’s faster charging and brighter display give it the edge.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi F3 | Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022 | Available. Released 2022, March 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.3 x 76.6 x 8.8 mm (6.63 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 179.5 g (6.31 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1650 pixels (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 106.2 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio P70 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", AF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 58 min |
| Type | 5150 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Hawaii Blue, Matte Silver, Starry Black, Sunglow Gold, Galaxy Blue | Power Black, Cool Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | MZB0B5VIN, 2201117PI, 2201117PG |
| Price | - | € 100.18 |
| SAR | - | 0.85 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 126h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 318444 (v9) GeekBench: 1836 (v5.1) GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Umidigi F3
- Lower price point
- Decent battery endurance
- Functional for basic tasks
- Slower processor
- Slower charging speed
- Less detailed display specs
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro
- Faster and more efficient processor
- Significantly faster charging (33W)
- Brighter display for outdoor use
- Potentially higher price
- Similar battery endurance to F3
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro’s display is a clear winner, boasting a measured peak brightness of 737 nits compared to the Umidigi F3’s unspecified brightness. This higher brightness translates to significantly better visibility in direct sunlight. While both displays have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for IPS LCDs), the Poco M4 Pro’s superior brightness makes it more usable in a wider range of lighting conditions. The F3’s display specs are less detailed, suggesting a more basic panel.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specs are lacking for both. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Poco M4 Pro’s brand reputation suggests a more refined image processing pipeline. The inclusion of features like OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) – common in Poco phones – would be a significant advantage, but is not confirmed here. The F3’s camera is likely more basic, suitable for casual snapshots.
Performance
The Poco M4 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G96 chipset represents a substantial upgrade over the Umidigi F3’s Helio P70. The G96 features two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.05 GHz, offering significantly better single-core performance than the P70’s Cortex-A73 cores at 2.1 GHz. While the P70 has eight cores, the G96’s more modern architecture delivers superior efficiency and responsiveness. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding tasks like gaming and app loading. The G96 also benefits from a more modern GPU, further enhancing its gaming capabilities.
Battery Life
Both the Umidigi F3 and Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro achieve an endurance rating of 126 hours, indicating similar battery life under typical usage. However, the Poco M4 Pro’s 33W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC3 support is a game-changer. It can reach 100% charge in just 58 minutes, while the F3’s 18W charging will take considerably longer. This faster charging is a significant convenience factor, especially for users who frequently use their phones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi F3 if you prioritize a lower initial cost and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a solid option for basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro if you value performance for gaming and multitasking, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and the convenience of rapid 33W charging. It’s the better all-rounder for users who demand more from their phone.