The Umidigi F3 and Oppo A76 represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone space. While both aim to deliver a functional Android experience without breaking the bank, they take different approaches to achieving this. The F3 relies on the older, but still capable, Mediatek Helio P70, while the A76 opts for Qualcomm’s newer, more efficient Snapdragon 680. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and consistent performance, the Oppo A76 emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 680, built on a 6nm process, offers superior efficiency and sustained performance compared to the Umidigi F3’s 12nm Helio P70. The faster 33W charging is a significant advantage, offsetting the F3’s slightly lower price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2022, February 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 168.3 x 76.6 x 8.8 mm (6.63 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 164.4 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1650 pixels (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 106.2 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio P70 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", AF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | 5150 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Hawaii Blue, Matte Silver, Starry Black, Sunglow Gold, Galaxy Blue | Glowing Black, Glowing Blue |
| Models | - | CPH2375 |
| Price | - | € 117.99 / £ 162.99 |
Umidigi F3
- Potentially lower price point
- Slightly higher CPU clock speed on some cores
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Less efficient 12nm chipset
- Slower 18W charging
- Likely more thermal throttling under load
Oppo A76
- More efficient 6nm Snapdragon 680 chipset
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Improved ISP for better image processing
- Smoother overall performance
- Potentially slightly higher price
- CPU clock speed slightly lower than F3 on some cores
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Details are missing regarding panel type, resolution, and refresh rate, suggesting both likely utilize standard LCD panels. However, the focus should be on the chipsets' ability to drive the display efficiently. The Snapdragon 680’s integrated GPU is likely more capable of handling UI animations and video playback smoothly, even if the panel specs are similar. Without further display specs, it's difficult to declare a clear winner.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Snapdragon 680 typically includes a more advanced Image Signal Processor (ISP) than the Helio P70. This means the A76 is likely to produce better image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions, with improved noise reduction and dynamic range. The ISP’s capabilities are crucial for post-processing, and Qualcomm generally excels in this area. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and lens apertures makes a definitive statement impossible, but the A76 has a processing advantage.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A76’s Snapdragon 680 (6nm) is a significant upgrade over the Umidigi F3’s Helio P70 (12nm). The 6nm process inherently provides better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and sustained performance. While the F3’s Cortex-A73 cores clock slightly higher (2.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz on the A76’s Kryo 265 Gold), the architectural improvements and process node of the Snapdragon 680 will deliver a more consistent experience, particularly during prolonged use. The A76 will likely exhibit less throttling under load. This benefits users who engage in moderate multitasking or casual gaming.
Battery Life
The Oppo A76’s 33W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Umidigi F3’s 18W charging. This translates to significantly faster top-up times, reducing downtime. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 680’s superior power efficiency means the A76 will likely achieve comparable or even better battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery. The 6nm process allows for more efficient power management, extending usage between charges. Users who frequently find themselves needing to recharge throughout the day will greatly benefit from the A76’s faster charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi F3 if you need a phone for very light tasks – basic messaging, calls, and occasional social media – and prioritize the absolute lowest price. You’ll be making compromises on performance and long-term efficiency. Buy the Oppo A76 if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience, especially with multitasking or light gaming, and value faster charging and better battery optimization. It’s a small premium for a noticeable improvement in daily usability.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 680 in the Oppo A76 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 680 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with acceptable frame rates. While it’s not a gaming powerhouse, the 6nm process and optimized GPU will provide a more stable experience than the Helio P70, reducing frame drops and stuttering during gameplay. Expect to adjust graphics settings for optimal performance.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Oppo A76 compared to the 18W charging on the Umidigi F3?
The 33W charging on the Oppo A76 will significantly reduce charging times. While exact 0-100% times depend on battery capacity (which isn't specified), you can expect the A76 to charge considerably faster – potentially shaving off 30-60 minutes compared to the F3. This is a major convenience factor for users who need to quickly top up their phone.
❓ Does the Umidigi F3 suffer from noticeable lag when multitasking?
The Umidigi F3, with its Helio P70 chipset, is likely to exhibit some lag when multitasking with several apps open simultaneously. The 12nm process and less efficient architecture mean it will struggle to maintain smooth performance under heavy load. Users who frequently switch between apps may find the experience frustrating.
