Umidigi F3 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a slightly more refined software experience, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G is the better choice. Its 67W charging capability dramatically reduces downtime, and the Snapdragon 695 offers a small but noticeable performance edge in sustained tasks. However, the Umidigi F3 Pro remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi F3 Pro | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.4 x 9.6 mm (6.52 x 3.01 x 0.38 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 6150 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starry Black, Matte Silver | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 160 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Umidigi F3 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Functional 5G connectivity
- Slow 18W charging
- Less efficient chipset (7nm)
- Potentially limited software support
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Ultra-fast 67W charging
- More efficient chipset (6nm)
- Potentially better long-term software support
- Slightly higher price
- Performance gains over F3 Pro are incremental
- Camera performance likely similar to F3 Pro
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the price point, expect both to offer adequate, but not exceptional, viewing experiences. The Poco X4 Pro 5G's larger display size (typically 6.67 inches vs. the F3 Pro's 6.58 inches) may appeal to media consumers, but without specific brightness data, it's difficult to assess outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific sensor details. The absence of information makes a direct comparison difficult. However, in this price bracket, larger sensor sizes and optical image stabilization (OIS) are rare. Expect both to perform adequately in good lighting conditions, but struggle in low-light scenarios. The usefulness of any included 2MP macro lenses on either device is questionable, offering limited practical benefit over the main sensor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) benefits from a more modern fabrication process than the Umidigi F3 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm). While both CPUs feature a 2x2.2 GHz core configuration, the Snapdragon 695 utilizes Kryo 660 Gold cores, generally offering better single-core performance. The 6nm process also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially leading to less throttling during prolonged gaming sessions. The Dimensity 700 is still capable for everyday tasks, but the Snapdragon 695 provides a more future-proof platform.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 119 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life. However, the charging experience is where they diverge dramatically. The Umidigi F3 Pro is limited to 18W wired charging, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G supports a blazing-fast 67W wired charging, including PD3.0 and QC3 standards. This translates to a 70% charge in just 22 minutes and a full charge in 41 minutes – a significant advantage for users who value convenience and minimal downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi F3 Pro if you need a functional 5G smartphone with a decent processor for everyday tasks and aren't overly concerned with rapid charging or extensive gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you prioritize quick top-ups thanks to its 67W charging, and want a slightly more polished user experience with potentially better long-term software support.