Umidigi F3 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smoother overall experience and a more refined camera system, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is the better choice. However, the Umidigi F3 Pro presents a compelling value proposition for those on a tight budget who primarily need reliable 5G connectivity and basic smartphone functionality.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi F3 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.4 x 9.6 mm (6.52 x 3.01 x 0.38 in) | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 6150 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starry Black, Matte Silver | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | - | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL |
| Price | About 160 EUR | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 |
| SAR | - | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9) GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Umidigi F3 Pro
- Significantly lower price point
- 5G connectivity
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Inferior display quality (likely)
- Less powerful processor
- Limited camera capabilities
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Brighter, more vibrant display
- More powerful processor for smoother performance
- Superior camera system with advanced image processing
- Higher price
- May experience some software bloat
- Charging speed, while faster, isn't class-leading
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 830 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Umidigi F3 Pro. This difference is crucial for outdoor visibility. While the Umidigi F3 Pro’s display specs are not provided, Samsung’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a superior viewing experience with deeper blacks. The A53’s Super AMOLED panel will also offer more vibrant colors and wider viewing angles than what is typically found in phones at the F3 Pro’s price point. The lack of detailed display information for the Umidigi suggests a cost-cutting approach in this area.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is expected to deliver superior image quality due to its more advanced image processing and potentially larger sensor size (specs not provided for Umidigi). Samsung’s camera system typically benefits from extensive software optimization, resulting in better dynamic range and detail. The Umidigi F3 Pro, while functional, likely relies on simpler image processing algorithms. The absence of detailed camera specs for the F3 Pro suggests a focus on affordability over photographic excellence. Users prioritizing camera quality will find the A53 a more compelling option.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is powered by the Exynos 1280 (5nm), featuring a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A78 cores – than the Umidigi F3 Pro’s Dimensity 700 (7nm). The A78 cores in the Exynos 1280 offer a performance advantage over the A76 cores in the Dimensity 700, resulting in faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. The 5nm fabrication process of the Exynos 1280 also contributes to better power efficiency and potentially less thermal throttling under sustained load. While both CPUs feature six Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the architectural advantage of the Exynos 1280 gives Samsung the edge in overall performance.
Battery Life
Both the Umidigi F3 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G share an endurance rating of 113 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G supports 25W wired charging, significantly faster than the Umidigi F3 Pro’s 18W charging. This means the A53 can replenish its battery more quickly, minimizing downtime. While both phones offer comparable battery endurance, the faster charging speed of the A53 provides a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi F3 Pro if you need a functional 5G smartphone at the absolute lowest price point and are willing to compromise on camera quality and processing power. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G if you prioritize a brighter, more vibrant display, a more versatile camera system, and a smoother, more responsive user experience, even if it comes at a higher cost.