Umidigi F3 Pro vs OnePlus Nord 2T: A Detailed Comparison for Smart Buyers
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord 2T is the superior choice. Its significantly more powerful Dimensity 1300 chipset and blazing-fast 80W charging outweigh the Umidigi F3 Pro’s lower price. While the F3 Pro offers a compelling value proposition, the Nord 2T delivers a smoother, more responsive experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi F3 Pro | OnePlus Nord 2T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2022, May 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023 | Available. Released 2022, May 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.4 x 9.6 mm (6.52 x 3.01 x 0.38 in) | 159.1 x 73.2 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 2.88 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Auto HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 80W wired, PD |
| Type | 6150 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starry Black, Matte Silver | Gray Shadow, Jade Fog |
| Models | - | CPH2399, CPH2401 |
| Price | About 160 EUR | € 144.39 / $ 169.99 / ₹ 31,490 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 490545 (v8) | 604467 (v9) GeekBench: 2790 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Umidigi F3 Pro
- Significantly lower price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Decent battery endurance
- Less powerful chipset
- Slow 18W charging
- Potentially lower display quality
OnePlus Nord 2T
- Much faster Dimensity 1300 processor
- Blazing-fast 80W charging
- Brighter and potentially higher-quality display
- Higher price tag
- May not represent a massive leap in camera quality over competitors
- Software bloat (typical of OnePlus)
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 2T boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 636 nits, compared to the Umidigi F3 Pro’s unspecified brightness. This difference translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for AMOLED panels), the Nord 2T’s higher peak brightness provides a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience. The F3 Pro’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a potentially lower-quality panel overall.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but the specifics are limited. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Nord 2T’s brand reputation and higher price point suggest a more refined camera system with better image processing. The F3 Pro likely relies on software optimization to compensate for potentially less capable hardware. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests reliance on digital stabilization, which can introduce artifacts in videos.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Umidigi F3 Pro utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm), while the OnePlus Nord 2T features the more advanced Dimensity 1300 (6nm). The Dimensity 1300’s octa-core configuration, with a prime Cortex-A78 core clocked at 3.0 GHz, significantly outperforms the F3 Pro’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 1300 also offers improved power efficiency, leading to better sustained performance and potentially less thermal throttling. This translates to faster app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience on the Nord 2T.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 100 hours, indicating similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Umidigi F3 Pro is limited to 18W wired charging, while the OnePlus Nord 2T supports 80W SuperVOOC charging with PD (Power Delivery). This means the Nord 2T can charge from 0-100% in a fraction of the time, offering significantly more convenience. The faster charging effectively mitigates any potential battery capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi F3 Pro if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks and prioritize absolute affordability above all else. It’s a solid option for users on a very tight budget who don’t demand high performance or rapid charging. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2T if you prefer a smoother user experience, faster app loading times, and the convenience of incredibly quick 80W charging – especially if you frequently find yourself needing to top up your battery throughout the day.