Umidigi F3 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing convenience and a brighter display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is the better choice. Its 67W charging dramatically reduces downtime, and the 746 nit display offers superior visibility outdoors. However, the Umidigi F3 5G presents a compelling alternative for those on a tighter budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi F3 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 168.3 x 76.6 x 8.8 mm (6.63 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1650 pixels (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 106.2 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2", AF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 5150 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starry Black, Matte Silver, Sunglow Gold | Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue |
| Models | - | 21091116I, 2201116SG |
| Price | - | € 120.33 / $ 230.00 / £ 319.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 288914 (v8), 382902 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Umidigi F3 5G
- Lower price point
- Functional 5G connectivity
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Slow 18W charging
- Likely dimmer display
- Potentially less refined camera system
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- 67W fast charging
- Brighter 746 nit display
- Potentially better camera system
- Higher price
- Snapdragon 695 may not be a huge leap over Dimensity 700
- Software bloat (typical of Xiaomi)
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 746 nits. This is a crucial advantage for outdoor visibility, making it easier to use in direct sunlight. While the Umidigi F3 5G’s display specs are not provided, it’s likely to be considerably dimmer. The Redmi’s 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a typical IPS panel, offering good color reproduction, but lacking the true blacks of OLED technology. The absence of refresh rate information for the Umidigi F3 5G suggests a standard 60Hz panel, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is likely to offer a 90Hz or 120Hz option, resulting in smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G likely features a more sophisticated camera system, potentially including a higher-resolution main sensor and optical image stabilization (OIS) – features common in Xiaomi’s mid-range offerings. The Umidigi F3 5G, given its price point, likely relies on a simpler camera setup. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to assess image quality, but the Redmi’s brand reputation suggests superior image processing and low-light performance. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and should not be a deciding factor.
Performance
Both phones utilize octa-core processors, but differ in their architecture and manufacturing process. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) benefits from a more efficient node size, potentially leading to better thermal management and power efficiency compared to the Umidigi F3 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm). While both CPUs peak at 2.2 GHz with their prime cores (Kryo 660 Gold vs Cortex-A76), the Snapdragon 695’s architecture is generally considered more refined. The Redmi’s potential for LPDDR4X or LPDDR5 RAM (market dependent) could also contribute to faster app loading and multitasking compared to the Umidigi, which likely uses LPDDR4X. This translates to a smoother user experience, especially for demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 115 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite differing charging capabilities. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s 67W wired charging is a game-changer. It can reach 50% charge in just 15 minutes and fully charge in 42 minutes, minimizing downtime. The Umidigi F3 5G’s 18W charging is significantly slower, requiring considerably longer to reach a full charge. This difference in charging speed is a major convenience factor, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi F3 5G if you need a functional 5G phone at the absolute lowest price point and aren't concerned with blazing-fast charging or a particularly bright screen. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G if you prioritize rapid charging, a vibrant display for media consumption, and a more polished software experience, even if it means spending a bit more.