Umidigi F3 5G vs Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G emerges as the better choice. Its significantly faster 67W charging, coupled with a comparable endurance rating of 119 hours, provides a more convenient and less anxiety-inducing experience. While the Umidigi F3 5G offers a respectable chipset, the Poco’s charging advantage is a game-changer.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi F3 5G | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 168.3 x 76.6 x 8.8 mm (6.63 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1650 pixels (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 106.2 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2", AF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 5150 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starry Black, Matte Silver, Sunglow Gold | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 2201116PG |
| Price | - | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Umidigi F3 5G
- Potentially cleaner software experience (Umidigi's UI is often less cluttered)
- Respectable performance for everyday tasks
- Competitive price point
- Slow 18W charging
- Limited display information
- Uncertain camera performance
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Ultra-fast 67W charging
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Xiaomi's established software and camera optimizations
- Xiaomi's MIUI can be resource-intensive
- Potential for bloatware
- May be slightly more expensive than the Umidigi
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing for the Umidigi F3 5G. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s display, while lacking high-end features like LTPO, benefits from Xiaomi’s established display calibration expertise. Without further data on the Umidigi’s panel, the Poco likely offers a more visually refined experience, especially in outdoor conditions.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. The absence of sensor size or aperture information makes a direct comparison impossible. It’s reasonable to assume the Poco X4 Pro 5G, given Xiaomi’s camera focus, will offer more sophisticated image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on many phones in this price range is often a marketing gimmick, and its utility is limited. Without further details, the Poco likely has the edge due to brand reputation and potential software optimizations.
Performance
The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) holds a slight architectural advantage over the Umidigi F3 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The 6nm process generally translates to better power efficiency and potentially lower thermal throttling under sustained load. While both CPUs feature a 2x2.2 GHz core configuration, the Snapdragon 695 utilizes Kryo 660 Gold cores, which are architecturally more advanced than the Cortex-A76 cores in the Dimensity 700. This difference, though not massive, will be noticeable in demanding applications and gaming. The Poco also benefits from potentially faster RAM speeds, though this isn't specified in the provided data.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Umidigi F3 5G is limited to 18W wired charging, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G supports a blazing-fast 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC3 compatibility. This translates to a 70% charge in just 22 minutes and a full charge in 41 minutes – a significant advantage for users who need to quickly top up their battery. The faster charging effectively mitigates any potential battery capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi F3 5G if you prioritize a clean software experience and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a good option for users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks and don’t mind topping up the battery overnight. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you value fast charging above all else, and need a phone that can quickly recover from heavy usage. It’s ideal for users who are constantly on the go and need a reliable, quickly-refreshed power source.