Umidigi C1 vs Oppo A17k: A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Performance

The Umidigi C1 and Oppo A17k represent the ultra-budget end of the smartphone spectrum, targeting users prioritizing affordability above all else. However, even within this segment, key differences in chipset architecture and processing power can significantly impact the user experience. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Oppo A17k is the superior choice. Its Helio G35 chipset, built on a more efficient 12nm process, delivers noticeably better performance than the Umidigi C1’s older MT6739. While both phones are entry-level, the A17k provides a smoother, more responsive experience for everyday tasks.

PHONES
Phone Names Umidigi C1 Oppo A17k
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 411, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced20222022, October 13
StatusAvailable. Released 2022Available. Released 2022, October 18
Body
Dimensions164.2 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 3.01 x 0.35 in)164.2 x 75.6 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight192 g (6.77 oz)189 g (6.67 oz)
 -IPX4 water resistance
Display
Protection-Panda Glass
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density)720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density)
Size6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio)6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM)
Platform
CPUQuad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
ChipsetMediatek MT6739 (28 nm)Mediatek MT6765 Helio G35 (12 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8100PowerVR GE8320
OSAndroid 13Android 12, ColorOS 12.1
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC
Internal32GB 3GB RAM64GB 3GB RAM
 -eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
Dual13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF Auxiliary lens-
FeaturesDual-LED flashLED flash, panorama
Single-8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single5 MP, f/2.2, (wide)5 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
Video720p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -Yes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth4.2, A2DP5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDSGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
RadioNoUnspecified
USBUSB Type-C, OTGmicroUSB 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging10W wired-
Type5150 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsSunglow Gold, Galaxy Blue, Starry BlackNavy Blue, Gold
Models-CPH2471
Price-About 130 EUR

Umidigi C1

  • Lowest possible price point
  • Functional for basic communication
  • Compact and lightweight

  • Outdated and slow processor
  • Poor multitasking performance
  • Limited software support

Oppo A17k

  • More powerful and efficient processor
  • Smoother user experience
  • Better multitasking capabilities

  • Slightly higher price
  • Still limited camera performance
  • Slow charging speed

Display Comparison

Neither Umidigi nor Oppo provide detailed display specifications. Given the price point, both likely utilize LCD panels with 720p+ resolutions. However, the lack of information prevents a direct comparison of brightness, color accuracy, or viewing angles. Expect both displays to be adequate for basic use but not exceptional. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both devices, maximizing screen real estate within a compact form factor.

Camera Comparison

Detailed camera specifications are unavailable for either device. However, given the market segment, expect basic camera setups. The focus should not be on image quality, but rather on functionality. Both phones likely feature a primary camera and potentially a secondary depth sensor. Image processing will be limited, and low-light performance will be poor. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device further limits their photographic capabilities. Any 2MP macro cameras included should be considered largely marketing features with limited practical utility.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Umidigi C1’s Mediatek MT6739, fabricated on a 28nm process, features a quad-core Cortex-A53 CPU clocked at 1.5 GHz. This older architecture struggles with multitasking and demanding applications. Conversely, the Oppo A17k boasts the Mediatek MT6765 Helio G35, built on a more efficient 12nm process. Its octa-core configuration – four Cortex-A53 cores at 2.3 GHz and four at 1.8 GHz – provides a significant performance boost. The higher clock speeds and additional cores translate to faster app loading times, smoother scrolling, and improved responsiveness. The 12nm process also contributes to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling under sustained load.

Battery Life

Battery capacity details are missing for both devices. However, the Oppo A17k’s 12nm Helio G35 chipset offers a power efficiency advantage over the Umidigi C1’s 28nm MT6739. This means the A17k is likely to achieve comparable or better battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity. Both phones feature 10W wired charging, indicating relatively slow charging speeds. Expect several hours to fully charge from 0-100%.

Buying Guide

Buy the Umidigi C1 if you absolutely need the lowest possible price and your usage is limited to basic communication – calls, texts, and very light web browsing. It’s a functional device for those with minimal smartphone needs. Buy the Oppo A17k if you want a more capable device for social media, occasional gaming, and a generally smoother user experience, even if it means spending a little more. The A17k’s improved processor makes it a more future-proof option.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Oppo A17k handle popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram smoothly?
Yes, the Helio G35 chipset in the Oppo A17k provides sufficient processing power for smooth operation of most social media applications. While it won't offer a flagship-level experience, it will handle scrolling, image loading, and video playback without significant lag, unlike the Umidigi C1 which may struggle.
❓ Is the Umidigi C1 suitable for playing mobile games?
The Umidigi C1 is not well-suited for gaming. The MT6739 chipset is underpowered for even basic mobile games, and you'll likely experience significant frame rate drops and lag. The Oppo A17k, while not a gaming phone, offers a marginally better experience for casual gaming due to its more powerful processor.
❓ What Android version do these phones ship with, and will they receive updates?
Both devices likely ship with Android Go Edition, a lightweight version of Android designed for low-end hardware. Software update support is typically limited on phones in this price range. Expect minimal or no major Android version updates, and security patches may be infrequent. The Oppo A17k, being from a larger brand, *might* receive slightly more consistent updates, but this is not guaranteed.
❓ How much storage do these phones typically offer, and is it expandable?
Both phones typically come with 32GB of internal storage, which is quite limited. Fortunately, both devices support microSD card expansion, allowing you to add more storage for photos, videos, and apps. This is crucial given the limited internal space.