Umidigi Bison vs. Bison Pro: Which Rugged Phone Delivers More Performance?

Umidigi’s Bison series targets the affordable rugged phone market, offering durability without breaking the bank. The Bison and Bison Pro represent incremental upgrades, but the core difference lies under the hood. This comparison dissects the chipset and performance implications to determine which model provides the best value for users needing a tough, reliable device.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Umidigi Bison Pro is the superior choice. The Helio G80 chipset offers a noticeable performance boost over the Bison’s Helio P60, particularly in gaming and multitasking, without sacrificing battery life given the similar charging speeds. The modest price premium is well worth it.

PHONES
Phone Names Umidigi Bison Umidigi Bison Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE
Launch
Announced2020. Released 20202021. Released 2021
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Dimensions162.5 x 79.9 x 12.8 mm (6.40 x 3.15 x 0.50 in)164 x 79.6 x 12.7 mm (6.46 x 3.13 x 0.5 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight250 g (8.82 oz)265 g (9.35 oz)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla GlassCorning Gorilla Glass
Resolution1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)
Size6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~75.0% screen-to-body ratio)6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~74.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek Helio P60 (12 nm)Mediatek Helio G80 (12 nm)
GPUMali-G72 MP3Mali-G52 MC2
OSAndroid 10Android 11
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 6GB RAM128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesDual-LED flash, HDR, panoramaDual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", AF 16 MP, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens-
Triple-48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", AF 16 MP, 117˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single24 MP, f/2.0, (wide)24 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth4.2, A2DP4.2, A2DP
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEOGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C, OTGUSB Type-C, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature)
Battery
Charging18W wired18W wired
Type5000 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsCyber Yellow, Lava OrangeStorm Gray, Hack Black

Umidigi Bison

  • Lower price point makes it very accessible.
  • Rugged design provides excellent drop protection.
  • Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks.

  • Helio P60 chipset feels dated and struggles with demanding apps.
  • May exhibit lag during multitasking.
  • Gaming performance is limited.

Umidigi Bison Pro

  • Helio G80 chipset delivers a noticeable performance boost.
  • Smoother multitasking and gaming experience.
  • More efficient processor potentially extends battery life.

  • Slightly higher price compared to the Bison.
  • Rugged design may feel bulky to some users.
  • 18W charging isn't the fastest available.

Display Comparison

Both the Bison and Bison Pro likely feature similar LCD panels, given their market positioning. While specific brightness nits aren't provided, the focus here is on durability, not display fidelity. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both models, prioritizing drop protection over a modern, edge-to-edge design. Color accuracy is likely standard for this price range, prioritizing visibility in direct sunlight over color calibration.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison. However, the chipset difference suggests the Bison Pro may have slightly improved image signal processing (ISP) capabilities, leading to better image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The ISP within the Helio G80 is more advanced, potentially offering faster processing and improved noise reduction. It’s reasonable to assume both phones will include a standard set of camera features for their price point, but the Bison Pro’s chipset provides a foundation for slightly better image processing.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Bison utilizes the Mediatek Helio P60, built on a 12nm process, featuring a CPU configuration of 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The Bison Pro steps up to the Helio G80, also 12nm, but with a more efficient CPU layout of 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Cortex-A75 cores in the G80 offer significantly improved single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and smoother overall responsiveness. The G80’s GPU is also more capable, providing a better gaming experience. While both use the same 12nm process, the architectural improvements in the G80 yield a tangible performance advantage.

Battery Life

Both devices share the same 18W wired charging capability. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Bison Pro’s more efficient Helio G80 chipset could translate to slightly better battery life despite potentially powering a more demanding display or other features. The 18W charging, while not exceptionally fast, should provide a reasonable 0-100% charge time, likely around 2-3 hours, for both devices. The G80’s efficiency means less power draw during typical usage, potentially offsetting any capacity differences.

Buying Guide

Buy the Umidigi Bison if your primary need is a highly durable phone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media, and you’re on a very tight budget. Buy the Umidigi Bison Pro if you anticipate more demanding usage – gaming, video streaming, or running multiple apps simultaneously – and want a smoother, more responsive experience. The Pro’s improved chipset translates to a significantly better user experience for power users.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Umidigi Bison Pro handle demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile smoothly?
The Helio G80 in the Bison Pro is a significant step up from the P60. While it won't deliver flagship-level performance, it should be capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile at medium settings with playable frame rates. Expect some occasional frame drops during intense action, but the experience will be noticeably smoother than on the Bison.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Helio P60 and Helio G80 noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. The Bison Pro’s Helio G80 offers faster app launch times, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive overall experience. While the Bison is adequate for basic tasks, the Pro feels more fluid and less prone to lag, even during everyday usage.
❓ Does the Umidigi Bison Pro overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Helio G80 is generally efficient, and the Bison Pro’s rugged design likely incorporates some thermal management features. While some heat is expected during prolonged gaming, it shouldn’t reach critical levels that cause significant performance throttling. The 12nm process helps mitigate heat buildup compared to older, larger node chipsets.
❓ Are both phones equally durable, or does the chipset impact the ruggedness?
Both phones are built to be rugged, with a focus on drop and water resistance. The chipset itself doesn't directly impact the physical durability. However, the Bison Pro’s more efficient processor could potentially reduce internal heat buildup, which *could* indirectly contribute to long-term component reliability.