Umidigi Bison X20 vs Bison Pro: Which Rugged Phone Delivers More?

Umidigi's Bison series targets users needing durable, affordable smartphones. The Bison X20 and Bison Pro represent different points within that spectrum, with the Pro offering a chipset upgrade and faster charging. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which model provides the best value for your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Umidigi Bison Pro is the superior choice. The Helio G80 chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the P60, particularly in gaming and multitasking, and the 18W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the X20 remains a viable option for basic use, the Pro’s improvements justify the price difference.

PHONES
Phone Names Umidigi Bison X20 Umidigi Bison Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 17, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTEGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE
Launch
Announced20242021. Released 2021
StatusAvailable. Released 2024Discontinued
Body
Dimensions172.1 x 83.8 x 12.9 mm (6.78 x 3.30 x 0.51 in)164 x 79.6 x 12.7 mm (6.46 x 3.13 x 0.5 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight278 g (9.81 oz)265 g (9.35 oz)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density)1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)
Size6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio)6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~74.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek Helio P60 (12 nm)Mediatek Helio G80 (12 nm)
GPUMali-G72 MP3Mali-G52 MC2
OSAndroid 13Android 11
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 6GB RAM128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM
Main Camera
Dual20 MP, f/2.2, (wide) 2 MP (macro)-
FeaturesLED flashDual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Triple-48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", AF 16 MP, 117˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single8 MP, f/2.2, (wide)24 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
Video720p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
35mm jackNoYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth4.2, A2DP4.2, A2DP
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO
RadioWireless FM radioNo
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature)
Battery
Charging10W wired18W wired
Type6000 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsGraphite BlackStorm Gray, Hack Black
PriceAbout 120 EUR-

Umidigi Bison X20

  • Lower price point makes it highly accessible.
  • Durable build quality expected from the Bison series.
  • Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks.

  • Helio P60 chipset feels dated and struggles with demanding apps.
  • Slow 10W charging is inconvenient.
  • Limited gaming performance.

Umidigi Bison Pro

  • Helio G80 chipset delivers a noticeable performance boost.
  • 18W fast charging reduces charging times.
  • Improved gaming experience compared to the X20.

  • Higher price compared to the Bison X20.
  • Still utilizes an LCD panel, lacking the vibrancy of AMOLED.
  • Rugged design may add bulk.

Display Comparison

Both phones likely feature similar LCD panels given their market segment, but detailed display specs (resolution, brightness) are unavailable. The focus here is on processing power, not display fidelity. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, prioritizing durability over a modern, edge-to-edge look.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, it’s reasonable to assume both phones feature similar camera setups focused on practicality rather than high-end photography. The image signal processor (ISP) within the Helio G80 may offer slightly improved image processing capabilities compared to the P60, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction. The absence of information on sensor sizes and apertures prevents a more definitive assessment.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Bison Pro’s Mediatek Helio G80 utilizes two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz, alongside six Cortex-A55 cores at 1.8 GHz. This is a significant upgrade over the Bison X20’s Helio P60, which employs four Cortex-A73 cores at 2.0 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores at 2.0 GHz. The A75 cores in the G80 offer superior single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. The G80 also benefits from a more modern GPU, providing a better gaming experience. While both are 12nm chips, the architectural improvements in the G80 deliver a tangible performance advantage.

Battery Life

Battery capacity is not specified, but both phones are likely equipped with batteries in the 4000-5000 mAh range, typical for rugged devices. The Bison Pro’s 18W wired charging is a clear advantage over the X20’s 10W charging. This translates to significantly faster charging times, reducing downtime and improving usability. A full charge on the Bison Pro will likely take around 2-2.5 hours, while the X20 could require 3+ hours.

Buying Guide

Buy the Umidigi Bison X20 if you prioritize absolute affordability and only need a phone for essential tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. Its Helio P60 is sufficient for these workloads. Buy the Umidigi Bison Pro if you want a more responsive experience, enjoy mobile gaming, or frequently use demanding apps – the Helio G80 and faster charging will be well worth the investment.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Bison Pro handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Helio G80 in the Bison Pro is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. While it won't deliver a flagship-level gaming experience, it's a significant improvement over the Bison X20's Helio P60, which would likely struggle with consistent performance.
❓ How much faster is the 18W charging on the Bison Pro compared to the 10W charging on the X20?
The 18W charging on the Bison Pro can reduce charging times by approximately 40-50% compared to the 10W charging on the X20. This means a full charge could take around 2-2.5 hours on the Pro, versus 3+ hours on the X20.
❓ Is the difference in CPU architecture (Cortex-A73 vs A75) noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the Cortex-A75 cores in the Bison Pro's Helio G80 offer a noticeable improvement in single-core performance. This translates to faster app launches, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive user experience, especially when multitasking.