Umidigi Bison X10S vs Oukitel WP17: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance

The rugged smartphone market offers a compelling alternative for users prioritizing durability and battery life. Both the Umidigi Bison X10S and Oukitel WP17 cater to this niche, but they diverge significantly in their core processing power. This comparison dissects these differences, focusing on how the chipset choices impact real-world performance and user experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user needing a reliable, durable phone for basic tasks and moderate use, the Oukitel WP17 emerges as the stronger choice. Its Helio G95 chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Bison X10S’s Tiger T310, translating to smoother multitasking and a more responsive experience, despite the slower charging.

PHONES
Phone Names Umidigi Bison X10S Oukitel WP17
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2021. Released 20212021, October
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2021, October
Body
Dimensions172.1 x 83.8 x 12.9 mm (6.78 x 3.30 x 0.51 in)-
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight279 g (9.84 oz)-
Display
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density)
Size6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio)6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD, 90Hz
Platform
CPUQuad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetUnisoc Tiger T310 (12nm)Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8300Mali-G76 MC4
OSAndroid 11Android 11
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC
Internal32GB 4GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesDual-LED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, panorama
Triple16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF 8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro)64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 20 MP, f/2.0, (night vision), 4 infrared night vision lights 2 MP (macro)
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single8 MP, f/2.2, (wide)16 MP
Video1080p@30fpsYes
Sound
35mm jackYesUnspecified
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LEYes
NFCNoYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioWireless FM radioUnspecified
USBUSB Type-C, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectYes
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, proximity, compassUnspecified
Battery
Charging10W wired-
Type6150 mAhLi-Po 8300 mAh
Misc
ColorsStorm GreyBlue, Camo, Camouflage
Price-About 240 EUR

Umidigi Bison X10S

  • Likely more affordable price point.
  • Potentially longer battery life if equipped with a larger capacity battery.
  • Rugged design for durability.

  • Significantly weaker processor performance.
  • Slower app loading times and multitasking.
  • Less suitable for gaming or demanding applications.

Oukitel WP17

  • Faster and more responsive performance thanks to the Helio G95.
  • Smoother multitasking and gaming experience.
  • Potentially better image processing capabilities.

  • Slower 10W charging.
  • Likely a higher price point than the Bison X10S.
  • May not offer significantly better battery life than the Bison X10S.

Display Comparison

Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The Oukitel WP17, being positioned slightly higher, may benefit from a higher peak brightness for improved outdoor visibility. Bezels are likely comparable, reflecting the rugged design focus over maximizing screen real estate. Color accuracy is expected to be standard for this segment, prioritizing durability over color fidelity.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is challenging. However, rugged phones often prioritize durability over camera quality. Both devices likely feature a primary camera for general photography, but image processing capabilities will likely differ. The G95’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) in the WP17 may offer slightly better image processing, potentially resulting in more detailed and vibrant photos. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and low resolution.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oukitel WP17’s MediaTek Helio G95 (12nm) is a significant upgrade over the Umidigi Bison X10S’s Unisoc Tiger T310 (12nm). The G95’s octa-core configuration (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) provides substantially more processing power than the T310’s quad-core setup (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55). The Cortex-A76 cores in the G95 offer a considerable architectural advantage over the A75 cores in the T310, resulting in faster single-core performance, crucial for app responsiveness. While both are 12nm, the G95’s more efficient design and higher clock speeds translate to better overall performance. This benefits users who multitask, play mobile games, or use demanding applications.

Battery Life

Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, but rugged phones typically prioritize large batteries. The Oukitel WP17’s 10W charging is significantly slower than what’s becoming standard, even in this price range. The Bison X10S also features 10W charging. This means longer charge times for both devices, but the WP17 will be noticeably slower. A larger battery capacity on the Bison X10S could offset the slower charging, but without that information, the WP17’s more efficient chipset may result in comparable real-world battery life despite a potentially smaller battery.

Buying Guide

Buy the Umidigi Bison X10S if you prioritize extreme value and are primarily focused on essential smartphone functions like calls, texts, and light social media use. Its lower price point makes it ideal for those needing a backup phone or a durable device for demanding work environments where replacement costs are a concern. Buy the Oukitel WP17 if you prefer a more fluid user experience, enjoy occasional gaming, or require faster app loading times. The G95 chipset offers a noticeable performance advantage for users who demand more from their smartphone.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Oukitel WP17’s Helio G95 overheat during extended gaming sessions?
While the Helio G95 is a capable processor, its thermal performance in the WP17 will depend on the phone’s cooling solution. Given the rugged design, passive cooling is likely, meaning some throttling may occur during prolonged, demanding gaming. However, it should still provide a significantly better gaming experience than the Bison X10S.
❓ Is the Unisoc Tiger T310 in the Umidigi Bison X10S sufficient for running popular social media apps like TikTok and Instagram?
The Tiger T310 can handle basic social media apps like TikTok and Instagram, but expect some lag and slower loading times, especially when multitasking. The experience won’t be as smooth or responsive as on a device with a more powerful chipset like the Helio G95.
❓ How does the 10W charging affect the daily usability of both phones?
10W charging is slow by modern standards. Expect a full charge to take several hours (likely 3-5 hours). This means you’ll need to charge overnight or during extended periods of inactivity. It’s a trade-off for the rugged design and potentially larger battery capacity, but it requires planning.