Umidigi Bison X10S vs Nokia XR20: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing 5G connectivity and long-term software support, the Nokia XR20 is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 480 chipset offers significantly improved performance and efficiency compared to the Bison X10S’s Unisoc Tiger T310, justifying the price difference. However, the Bison X10S remains a compelling option for those on a tight budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi Bison X10S | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021. Released 2021 | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 172.1 x 83.8 x 12.9 mm (6.78 x 3.30 x 0.51 in) | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 279 g (9.84 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T310 (12nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8300 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF 8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | 6150 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Storm Grey | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | - | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
Umidigi Bison X10S
- Significantly lower price point
- Rugged design for durability
- Potentially longer battery life due to less demanding chipset (depending on battery capacity)
- Slow 10W charging
- Less powerful Unisoc Tiger T310 chipset
- Limited software update support
Nokia XR20
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- More powerful Snapdragon 480 chipset
- 18W wired and 15W wireless charging
- Nokia’s commitment to Android updates and security patches
- Higher price compared to the Bison X10S
- May not offer significantly better battery life despite faster charging
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. While specific display specs (resolution, panel type) are missing for the Bison X10S, its price point suggests a basic LCD panel. The Nokia XR20, similarly, doesn't highlight display prowess. However, the XR20’s focus on outdoor usability suggests a higher peak brightness than the Bison X10S, crucial for visibility in direct sunlight. The absence of high refresh rates on both devices indicates a focus on power efficiency rather than fluid visuals.
Camera Comparison
Both phones likely feature modest camera systems geared towards functional photography rather than high-end image quality. Without detailed sensor information for the Bison X10S, it’s safe to assume the XR20’s camera, while not flagship-level, benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processing capabilities. The XR20’s camera system is likely to offer more consistent performance across various lighting conditions. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests limited utility; these sensors typically produce low-resolution images with limited detail.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Nokia XR20’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 (8nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Umidigi Bison X10S’s Unisoc Tiger T310 (12nm). The Snapdragon 480’s octa-core configuration (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) provides a noticeable boost in multitasking and app loading speeds compared to the Bison X10S’s quad-core setup (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55). The 8nm process node of the Snapdragon 480 also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained use. This benefits users who engage in moderate gaming or run demanding applications.
Battery Life
The battery capacity is not specified for the Bison X10S, but given its focus on affordability, it's likely comparable to or slightly smaller than the XR20’s. However, the Nokia XR20’s 18W wired charging and 15W wireless charging provide a significant advantage over the Bison X10S’s slow 10W wired charging. This means the XR20 can be topped up much faster, minimizing downtime. While a larger battery capacity is desirable, the XR20’s faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery size.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi Bison X10S if you need a highly affordable, durable phone for basic tasks and aren't concerned with 5G or frequent software updates. It's ideal for construction workers, outdoor enthusiasts on a budget, or as a reliable backup device. Buy the Nokia XR20 if you prefer a more future-proof device with 5G, faster processing speeds for multitasking and gaming, and Nokia’s commitment to Android updates and security patches. This phone suits users who need a rugged device for demanding work or active lifestyles and value long-term usability.