Umidigi Bison X10S vs Motorola Defy 2: A Rugged Reality Check
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and future-proofing, the Motorola Defy 2 is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 930 chipset offers a substantial performance advantage over the Umidigi Bison X10S’s Unisoc Tiger T310. While the Bison X10S is cheaper, the Defy 2’s superior processing power and wireless charging justify the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi Bison X10S | Motorola Defy 2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 23, 25, 26, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 255, 256 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021. Released 2021 | 2023, February 24 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, October |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 172.1 x 83.8 x 12.9 mm (6.78 x 3.30 x 0.51 in) | 171 x 80 x 11.9 mm (6.73 x 3.15 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 279 g (9.84 oz) | 268 g (9.45 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~76.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T310 (12nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8300 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF 8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Emergency SOS via satellite (Bullitt Satellite Connect service) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wireless |
| Type | 6150 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Storm Grey | Black |
| Models | - | BM1S1B |
| Price | - | About 570 EUR |
Umidigi Bison X10S
- Significantly lower price point
- Ruggedized design for durability
- Potentially longer battery life due to less demanding chipset
- Substantially slower performance
- Slow 10W wired charging only
- Likely inferior camera quality
Motorola Defy 2
- Much faster and more responsive performance
- Convenient 15W wireless charging
- Potentially better camera quality
- Higher price point
- May experience slightly more thermal throttling under extreme load
- Wireless charging is slower than fast wired charging
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the provided data, a direct comparison is limited. However, the market segment suggests both will likely feature LCD panels. The focus here is on durability, not visual fidelity. Expect adequate brightness for outdoor visibility, but don't anticipate vibrant colors or high resolutions. The Defy 2, being a slightly more premium offering, *may* have a slightly higher peak brightness, but this is speculative.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a thorough comparison is difficult. However, given the price points, expect both phones to feature modest camera systems. The Motorola Defy 2, positioned as a slightly more premium device, likely has a larger main sensor and potentially better image processing algorithms. The Bison X10S will likely prioritize affordability over camera quality. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering minimal practical benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The performance gap is the defining characteristic of this comparison. The Motorola Defy 2’s Mediatek Dimensity 930, fabricated on a 6nm process, is in a different league than the Umidigi Bison X10S’s Unisoc Tiger T310 (12nm). The Dimensity 930’s octa-core configuration (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) provides significantly more processing power than the Bison X10S’s quad-core setup (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55). This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the Defy 2. The 6nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling under sustained load. Users who frequently use demanding apps or play graphically intensive games will overwhelmingly benefit from the Defy 2.
Battery Life
The Umidigi Bison X10S’s 10W wired charging is significantly slower than the Motorola Defy 2’s 15W wireless charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Defy 2’s wireless charging capability offers a convenience factor the Bison X10S lacks. Wireless charging, while slower than wired, is ideal for topping up throughout the day without needing a cable. The Dimensity 930’s superior power efficiency also contributes to potentially longer battery life on the Defy 2, despite potentially having a similar capacity to the Bison X10S.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi Bison X10S if you need a highly affordable, extremely durable phone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light app usage, and aren't concerned with demanding performance. Buy the Motorola Defy 2 if you prefer a more responsive experience for multitasking, gaming, and media consumption, and value the convenience of wireless charging, even at a higher price point.