Umidigi Bison X10S vs Cat S62 Pro: A Head-to-Head Rugged Smartphone Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a balance of affordability and reliable performance, the Cat S62 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. While the Bison X10S offers a lower price point, the Snapdragon 660’s superior processing power and established architecture provide a smoother, more responsive experience, justifying the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi Bison X10S | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021. Released 2021 | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 172.1 x 83.8 x 12.9 mm (6.78 x 3.30 x 0.51 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 279 g (9.84 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T310 (12nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8300 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF 8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | 6150 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Storm Grey | Black |
| Price | - | About 530 EUR |
Umidigi Bison X10S
- Lower price point makes it accessible.
- Rugged design provides essential drop and water resistance.
- Unisoc T310 offers decent efficiency for basic tasks.
- Significantly weaker processor compared to the Snapdragon 660.
- Likely limited multitasking capabilities.
- Basic display quality expected.
Cat S62 Pro
- More powerful Snapdragon 660 processor for smoother performance.
- Established brand reputation in the rugged phone market.
- Potentially better camera image processing.
- Higher price compared to the Umidigi Bison X10S.
- Slow 10W charging.
- LCD display lacks modern features like high refresh rate.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. Details regarding panel type, resolution, and refresh rate are absent for the Bison X10S, suggesting a basic LCD. The Cat S62 Pro also utilizes an LCD, but its focus is on visibility in bright sunlight, a crucial feature for outdoor work. While neither phone will impress videophiles, the Cat S62 Pro’s likely higher peak brightness (based on its target market) provides a practical advantage for field use. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, prioritizing structural integrity over a modern, edge-to-edge design.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are limited, but the focus on ruggedness suggests neither phone prioritizes photographic excellence. The Cat S62 Pro likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), offering better image processing capabilities than the Unisoc T310’s ISP. While sensor size and aperture are unknown for both, the Cat S62 Pro’s brand positioning suggests a more refined camera experience, even if it doesn’t compete with flagship smartphones. The prevalence of low-resolution auxiliary cameras on budget rugged phones suggests avoiding expectations for high-quality macro or depth sensing on either device.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipset. The Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm) is an octa-core processor with a Kryo architecture, offering a significant performance advantage over the Umidigi Bison X10S’s Unisoc Tiger T310 (12nm) quad-core CPU. The Snapdragon 660’s higher clock speeds (2.2 GHz vs 2.0 GHz) and more cores translate to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better performance in graphically intensive applications. The Unisoc T310, while efficient, is geared towards basic functionality. The 14nm process of the Snapdragon 660, while older, is a mature technology, likely offering better thermal management than the newer 12nm Unisoc chip under sustained load. This benefits users who rely on their phones for extended periods of navigation or data logging.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Cat S62 Pro’s 10W charging is significantly slower than what’s becoming standard, even in the budget segment. The Umidigi Bison X10S also features 10W charging. This suggests both phones prioritize battery longevity over quick top-ups. Users should expect several hours to fully charge either device. Real-world battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns, but the Snapdragon 660’s efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery capacity in the Cat S62 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi Bison X10S if you need a highly affordable, basic rugged phone for essential communication and light tasks, and are willing to accept compromises in processing speed. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prefer a more refined user experience, better performance for multitasking and demanding apps, and a proven track record of durability from a well-established rugged phone brand.