Umidigi Bison X10G vs Bison Pro: Which Rugged Phone Reigns Supreme?

Umidigi has carved a niche for itself in the rugged smartphone market, offering durable devices at competitive prices. The Bison X10G and Bison Pro represent two points within that lineup, differing primarily in their core processing power and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects those differences to determine which model best suits your needs, particularly focusing on the impact of the chipset choice on everyday performance and longevity.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Umidigi Bison Pro is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Helio G80 chipset, featuring an octa-core configuration, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Bison X10G’s Unisoc Tiger T310. The faster 18W charging also significantly reduces downtime, making the Pro a more practical daily driver despite a potentially similar battery capacity.

PHONES
Phone Names Umidigi Bison X10G Umidigi Bison Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE
Launch
Announced2021. Released 20212021. Released 2021
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Dimensions172.1 x 83.8 x 13.1 mm (6.78 x 3.30 x 0.52 in)164 x 79.6 x 12.7 mm (6.46 x 3.13 x 0.5 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight-265 g (9.35 oz)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density)1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)
Size6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio)6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~74.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Platform
CPUQuad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetUnisoc Tiger T310 (12nm)Mediatek Helio G80 (12 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8300Mali-G52 MC2
OSAndroid 11Android 11
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal32GB 4GB RAM128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesDual-LED flash, HDR, panoramaDual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Triple16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF 8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro)48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", AF 16 MP, 117˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single8 MP, f/2.2, (wide)24 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE4.2, A2DP
NFCNoYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO
RadioWireless FM radioNo
USBUSB Type-C, OTGUSB Type-C, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature)
Battery
Charging10W wired18W wired
Type6150 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsHack BlackStorm Gray, Hack Black

Umidigi Bison X10G

  • Potentially lower price point
  • Rugged design for durability
  • Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks

  • Slower Unisoc Tiger T310 processor
  • Slow 10W charging
  • Limited multitasking capabilities

Umidigi Bison Pro

  • Faster Mediatek Helio G80 processor
  • Faster 18W charging
  • Improved multitasking and gaming performance

  • Likely higher price than the X10G
  • Rugged design may add bulk
  • Camera performance dependent on sensor quality (unknown)

Display Comparison

Neither Umidigi provides detailed display specifications. Assuming typical IPS LCD panels for this price bracket, the display experience will likely be similar in terms of color accuracy and viewing angles. The absence of high refresh rates is expected. The key difference will likely be brightness, but without nits data, it's impossible to determine which offers better outdoor visibility. Bezels are also likely comparable, focusing on durability rather than minimizing screen borders.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specs beyond the presence of a macro lens (likely 2MP on both), a direct comparison is difficult. Both phones likely feature a primary camera sensor, but resolution and sensor size are unknown. The image processing capabilities of the respective chipsets will play a role, with the Helio G80’s ISP likely offering better noise reduction and dynamic range. The macro lens on both is likely a marketing feature rather than a significant photographic asset.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Bison X10G’s Unisoc Tiger T310 is a quad-core processor built on a 12nm process. While efficient, its four cores are significantly less capable than the Bison Pro’s Mediatek Helio G80. The G80 boasts an octa-core configuration (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) also on a 12nm process, offering superior multi-tasking and gaming performance. The two Cortex-A75 cores in the G80 provide a substantial boost in single-core performance, crucial for app launch speeds and responsiveness. The Bison Pro will handle demanding applications and games with greater ease, while the X10G may exhibit noticeable lag under heavy load. RAM configurations are not specified, but the chipset difference will be the dominant factor.

Battery Life

Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Bison Pro’s 18W wired charging is a significant advantage over the X10G’s 10W charging. This translates to a much faster 0-100% charge time, reducing downtime. Even with a similar battery capacity, the faster charging speed makes the Bison Pro more convenient for users who rely heavily on their phones throughout the day. The efficiency of the Helio G80 may also contribute to slightly better battery life under moderate use, offsetting any capacity differences.

Buying Guide

Buy the Umidigi Bison X10G if your primary need is extreme durability on a very tight budget and you primarily use your phone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. You’ll accept slower performance and longer charging times. Buy the Umidigi Bison Pro if you want a more responsive experience for multitasking, occasional gaming, and appreciate the convenience of faster charging, even if it means a slightly higher upfront cost. The Pro is the better all-rounder.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Unisoc Tiger T310 in the Bison X10G struggle with popular apps like TikTok or Facebook?
The Unisoc Tiger T310 is a basic processor. While it can run these apps, you may experience noticeable lag when scrolling through feeds or switching between apps. The Bison Pro’s Helio G80 will provide a much smoother and more responsive experience with these commonly used applications.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Bison X10G with its 10W charging?
With 10W charging, a full charge from 0% will likely take over 3 hours, potentially closer to 4, depending on the battery capacity. The Bison Pro’s 18W charging will significantly reduce this time, potentially to around 1.5-2 hours.
❓ Is the Bison Pro suitable for playing demanding mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Helio G80 in the Bison Pro is capable of running these games at medium settings. However, don't expect maximum graphics settings or consistently high frame rates. The Bison X10G will likely struggle to provide a playable experience with these titles.
❓ Do either of these phones support NFC for contactless payments?
Neither Umidigi explicitly lists NFC support for these models. Given their budget positioning, it's unlikely that either phone includes NFC functionality. Check retailer listings for confirmation before purchasing if NFC is a requirement.