Umidigi Bison X10G vs Blackview BV8800: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and faster charging, the Blackview BV8800 is the better choice. Its Helio G96 chipset offers a significant performance uplift over the Bison X10G’s Tiger T310, and the 33W charging dramatically reduces downtime. However, the Bison X10G remains a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi Bison X10G | Blackview BV8800 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021. Released 2021 | 2021, December 24 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, January 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 172.1 x 83.8 x 13.1 mm (6.78 x 3.30 x 0.52 in) | 176.2 x 83.5 x 17.7 mm (6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 367 g (12.95 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T310 (12nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8300 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, Doke-OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 32GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide) 20 MP, f/1.8, (IR camera), 2 IR emitters Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF 8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 33W wired, 31% in 30 min, 100% in 90 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 6150 mAh | 8380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Hack Black | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | - | About 350 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 199h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1348:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 254849 (v8), 288964 (v9) GeekBench: 1752 (v5.1) GFXBench: 10fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Umidigi Bison X10G
- Affordable price point
- 5G connectivity
- Rugged design for durability
- Significantly weaker processor
- Slow 10W charging
- Limited performance for demanding tasks
Blackview BV8800
- Faster and more capable Helio G96 processor
- 33W fast charging with reverse wired charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Higher price than the Bison X10G
- No 5G connectivity
- Camera details are lacking
Display Comparison
Both devices share a contrast ratio of 1348:1, suggesting similar visual depth. However, the Blackview BV8800 boasts a measured peak brightness of 501 nits, which is crucial for outdoor visibility – a key requirement for rugged phone users. While the Bison X10G’s display specifications are not provided, the BV8800’s higher brightness gives it a clear advantage in direct sunlight. The lack of information on the Bison X10G’s panel type (IPS, AMOLED) makes a detailed comparison difficult, but the BV8800’s brightness is a tangible benefit.
Camera Comparison
Both phones list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing information, a direct comparison is impossible. However, the rugged phone market often prioritizes durability over camera quality. It’s reasonable to assume both phones offer adequate cameras for basic documentation, but neither is likely to compete with dedicated camera phones. The absence of details suggests neither device is a standout in this category.
Performance
The Blackview BV8800’s Mediatek Helio G96 chipset is the clear performance leader. Its octa-core configuration (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) significantly outperforms the Umidigi Bison X10G’s quad-core Unisoc Tiger T310 (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55). The G96’s Cortex-A76 cores provide a substantial boost in single-core performance, impacting app launch speeds and responsiveness. While both chipsets are fabricated on a 12nm process, the G96’s architectural advantages translate to a smoother experience, particularly in demanding applications and games. The Bison X10G’s 5G connectivity is a plus, but the performance trade-off is significant.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 199 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Blackview BV8800’s 33W wired charging is a game-changer. It can reach 31% charge in just 30 minutes and fully charge in 90 minutes, minimizing downtime. The Umidigi Bison X10G’s 10W charging is significantly slower, requiring considerably longer to reach a full charge. The BV8800 also offers reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories in the field, which the Bison X10G lacks.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi Bison X10G if you need a 5G-enabled rugged phone on a strict budget and aren't demanding in terms of gaming or intensive multitasking. Buy the Blackview BV8800 if you prefer a smoother user experience, faster charging speeds, and are willing to spend a bit more for improved performance and convenience, especially if you frequently use your phone outdoors.