Umidigi Bison X10G NFC vs. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022): A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset, built on a 6nm process, offers significantly better CPU and GPU performance than the Umidigi’s Unisoc Tiger T310, despite both phones sharing the same 10W charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi Bison X10G NFC | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - USA |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 5, 12, 14, 24, 26, 29, 30, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA - USA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021. Released 2021 | 2022, April 22 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, April 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 172.1 x 83.8 x 13.1 mm (6.78 x 3.30 x 0.52 in) | 168.9 x 75.8 x 9.3 mm (6.65 x 2.98 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| - | Stylus Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T310 (12nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8300 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF 8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0, 1.12µm Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired, QC3 |
| Type | 6150 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Hack Black | Steel Blue, Seafoam Green |
| Models | - | XT2215, XT2215-1, XT2215-2, XT2215-3, XT2215-4 |
| Price | - | $ 66.60 |
Umidigi Bison X10G NFC
- Extremely affordable price point
- Ruggedized design for durability
- NFC support for contactless payments
- Significantly weaker processor performance
- Slow 10W charging
- Likely limited software updates
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022)
- More powerful Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Integrated stylus for note-taking and creativity
- QC3 support for potentially faster charging
- Still slow 10W charging (without QC3 charger)
- Higher price compared to Umidigi
- May not be as rugged as the Bison X10G
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, a common choice in this price bracket. However, the Motorola benefits from a larger screen size, potentially offering a more immersive viewing experience. The Umidigi’s display specifications are not provided, making a direct comparison difficult, but the Motorola’s larger size is a tangible advantage. Color accuracy and peak brightness are likely similar, leaning towards adequate rather than exceptional.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the main sensor, a precise comparison is challenging. However, the Motorola likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), which generally delivers superior image processing compared to Unisoc’s offerings. The Motorola’s larger sensor size (assuming a typical sensor size for this chipset) would also contribute to better low-light performance. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the Motorola, if present (market segment suggests likely), would further enhance image clarity and reduce blur. The Umidigi’s camera system is likely more basic, focusing on providing functional images rather than exceptional quality.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, fabricated on a power-efficient 6nm process, featuring an octa-core CPU with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. This contrasts sharply with the Umidigi Bison X10G NFC’s Unisoc Tiger T310 (12nm), a quad-core processor with a single 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 core and three 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The 6nm process and higher clock speeds of the Snapdragon 695 translate to noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The architectural difference – octa-core vs. quad-core – further widens the gap, especially in demanding tasks.
Battery Life
Both phones feature 10W wired charging, a significant drawback in today’s fast-charging landscape. The Motorola’s support for Quick Charge 3.0 (QC3) offers a slight advantage, potentially allowing for faster charging with a compatible charger (sold separately). While battery capacity isn’t specified for the Umidigi, the Motorola’s likely larger battery (typical for this class) combined with the more efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset should result in longer real-world battery life. The 10W charging speed on both devices means a full charge will take a considerable amount of time, likely exceeding 3 hours.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi Bison X10G NFC if you absolutely need a rugged, NFC-enabled phone on the tightest of budgets and are willing to compromise on processing power. Buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) if you value smoother performance for multitasking and gaming, appreciate the convenience of a stylus, and want a phone that will likely receive more software updates.