Umidigi Bison X10 Pro vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Head-to-Head Rugged Smartphone Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a balance of affordability and reliable performance, the Cat S62 Pro emerges as the better choice. While the Bison X10 Pro offers a compelling price point, the Snapdragon 660’s more efficient 14nm process and generally smoother performance outweigh the Umidigi’s cost savings.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi Bison X10 Pro | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021. Released 2021 | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 169.7 x 82.1 x 12.9 mm (6.68 x 3.23 x 0.51 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 285 g (10.05 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~73.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio P60 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Triple | 20 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF 8 MP, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | 6150 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Storm Gray, Supersonic Yellow, Hack Black | Black |
| Price | - | About 530 EUR |
Umidigi Bison X10 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Rugged design for durability
- Octa-core processor for multitasking
- Slower charging speed (10W)
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 660
- Potentially lower image quality
Cat S62 Pro
- More powerful Snapdragon 660 chipset
- Better thermal efficiency
- Potentially superior camera performance
- Higher price tag
- May lack extremely fast charging
- Rugged design may be bulkier
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. Details on panel type (IPS vs. TFT) and resolution are missing, but both likely target functional clarity over visual fidelity. The key difference lies under the hood: processing power impacts UI responsiveness. A smoother experience on the Cat S62 Pro, thanks to the Snapdragon 660, will translate to more pleasant scrolling and app loading, even if the raw pixel count is similar.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the core chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Snapdragon 660’s image signal processor (ISP) is generally more advanced than the Helio P60’s, offering potentially better image processing, dynamic range, and low-light performance. The Cat S62 Pro likely benefits from superior noise reduction and color accuracy. The prevalence of low-resolution auxiliary cameras on budget rugged phones suggests avoiding expectations for exceptional macro or depth sensing on either device.
Performance
The chipset is where the most significant divergence occurs. The Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, fabricated on a 14nm process, generally outperforms the Umidigi Bison X10 Pro’s MediaTek Helio P60 (12nm). While the Helio P60 features a similar octa-core configuration, the Snapdragon 660’s Kryo 260 cores offer a more refined architecture and higher clock speeds (2.2 GHz vs 2.0 GHz). This translates to faster app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience. The 14nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. Users intending to play graphically demanding games will find the Snapdragon 660 a more capable partner.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature large batteries to support their rugged lifestyles, but specific capacities are not provided. The Umidigi Bison X10 Pro’s 10W charging is a significant drawback. The Cat S62 Pro, while potentially lacking fast charging, benefits from the Snapdragon 660’s more efficient power consumption. This means the Cat S62 Pro is likely to achieve comparable or better battery life with a similar capacity battery, and will likely charge faster even without a headline-grabbing wattage number.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi Bison X10 Pro if you need a highly affordable rugged phone for basic tasks like communication and light media consumption, and are willing to accept some performance limitations. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prioritize smoother multitasking, slightly better gaming performance, and a more established brand reputation within the rugged phone space, even at a higher price.