Umidigi Bison GT2 Pro vs Cat S62 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and value, the Umidigi Bison GT2 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Mediatek Helio G95 chipset offers a noticeable performance edge over the Snapdragon 660 in the Cat S62 Pro, making it better suited for demanding tasks and gaming. However, the Cat S62 Pro’s build quality and brand reputation for ruggedness remain strong contenders.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi Bison GT2 Pro | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 83.9 x 12.9 mm (6.78 x 3.30 x 0.51 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 280 g (9.88 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~70.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 24 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | - |
| Type | 6150 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Hack Black | Black |
| Price | - | About 530 EUR |
Umidigi Bison GT2 Pro
- More powerful processor for smoother performance
- Potentially better thermal management
- Generally more affordable price point
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Less established brand reputation for ruggedness
Cat S62 Pro
- Established brand reputation for rugged devices
- Power-efficient Snapdragon 660 chipset
- Potentially longer battery life for basic tasks
- Older and less powerful processor
- Higher price compared to the Bison GT2 Pro
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. Details on panel type (IPS vs AMOLED) and resolution are missing, but the focus here is on ruggedness, not visual fidelity. The lack of information prevents a detailed comparison, but both likely prioritize durability over color accuracy. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both to contribute to shock absorption. The absence of high refresh rates is also expected, prioritizing battery life.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. However, the processing capabilities of the Helio G95 in the Bison GT2 Pro likely offer more advanced image processing algorithms. The Snapdragon 660’s image signal processor (ISP) is capable, but older. The absence of information regarding sensor size and aperture makes it difficult to assess low-light performance. It’s safe to assume both phones will feature practical, rather than flagship-level, camera systems geared towards documentation rather than professional photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Umidigi Bison GT2 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G95 (12nm) utilizes a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A76 cores – compared to the Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm). While the Snapdragon 660 has a slightly higher peak clock speed (2.2 GHz vs 2.05 GHz), the G95’s architecture provides better single-core and multi-core performance. The 12nm process node of the G95 is also more efficient than the 14nm node of the 660, potentially leading to better thermal management under sustained load. This translates to smoother multitasking and a more responsive user experience on the Bison GT2 Pro, particularly for users running demanding apps or playing graphically intensive games.
Battery Life
Battery capacity details are missing for both devices. However, the Umidigi Bison GT2 Pro’s 18W charging is slower than what’s typically found in modern smartphones. The Snapdragon 660 is known for its power efficiency, potentially offsetting a smaller battery capacity. The G95, while more powerful, consumes more energy. Real-world battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns, but the S62 Pro may offer slightly longer endurance for basic tasks due to the more efficient chipset.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi Bison GT2 Pro if you need a rugged phone that can handle demanding applications, occasional gaming, and offers a significant performance-to-price ratio. It’s ideal for users who prioritize speed and responsiveness. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prefer a phone from a well-established rugged phone brand with a focus on reliability and a more conservative, power-efficient approach to performance. It’s better suited for users who need a dependable workhorse for basic tasks and prioritize long-term durability over peak performance.