Umidigi Bison GT2 Pro vs Blackview BV8800: A Rugged Reliability Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Blackview BV8800 emerges as the better choice. Its 33W charging significantly reduces downtime compared to the Bison GT2 Pro’s 18W, and the Helio G96 chipset, while architecturally similar, offers a slight edge in overall performance. The endurance rating of 199h is also a significant advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi Bison GT2 Pro | Blackview BV8800 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2021, December 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022 | Available. Released 2022, January 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 83.9 x 12.9 mm (6.78 x 3.30 x 0.51 in) | 176.2 x 83.5 x 17.7 mm (6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 280 g (9.88 oz) | 367 g (12.95 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~70.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G95 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11, Doke-OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide) 20 MP, f/1.8, (IR camera), 2 IR emitters Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 24 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 31% in 30 min, 100% in 90 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 6150 mAh | 8380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Hack Black | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | - | About 350 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 199h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1348:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 254849 (v8), 288964 (v9) GeekBench: 1752 (v5.1) GFXBench: 10fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Umidigi Bison GT2 Pro
- Potentially lower price point
- Rugged design for durability
- Acceptable battery life (199h endurance)
- Slow 18W charging
- Helio G95 chipset is slightly older
- Limited camera details
Blackview BV8800
- Faster 33W charging with reverse wired charging
- Slightly more powerful Helio G96 chipset
- Higher peak brightness for outdoor visibility
- Potentially higher price
- Camera specs lack detail
- Rugged design may add bulk
Display Comparison
Both the Umidigi Bison GT2 Pro and Blackview BV8800 share a contrast ratio of 1348:1, suggesting similar color reproduction capabilities. However, the Blackview BV8800 boasts a measured peak brightness of 501 nits, which is crucial for outdoor visibility. While neither phone specifies panel technology (LTPO, AMOLED), the brightness advantage of the BV8800 makes it more usable in direct sunlight, a common scenario for rugged phone users.
Camera Comparison
Both phones list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size or image processing. This suggests a focus on quantity over quality. Without further information, it’s difficult to assess camera performance. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on both devices is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
Both devices utilize Mediatek’s Helio series, with the Bison GT2 Pro featuring the Helio G95 and the BV8800 the Helio G96. Both chipsets employ the same CPU core configuration – a 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. The G96 offers a slightly higher clock speed for the GPU, potentially translating to marginally better gaming performance. However, the real-world difference will likely be minimal for most applications. Neither phone details RAM speed (LPDDR4X is likely), which is a limiting factor for multitasking.
Battery Life
The Blackview BV8800’s 33W charging is a significant advantage over the Umidigi Bison GT2 Pro’s 18W. The BV8800 can reach 31% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 90 minutes, minimizing downtime. Both phones share an endurance rating of 199 hours, indicating comparable battery life under typical usage. The faster charging of the BV8800 effectively mitigates any potential difference in battery capacity, making it the more convenient option for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi Bison GT2 Pro if you prioritize a lower initial cost and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a solid option for users who primarily need a durable phone for basic tasks. Buy the Blackview BV8800 if you value faster charging, a slightly more powerful chipset, and a longer-lasting battery, making it ideal for outdoor enthusiasts, construction workers, or anyone who relies heavily on their phone throughout the day.