Umidigi A9 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro: A Detailed Comparison for Budget Gamers
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 860 chipset provides significantly faster performance, crucial for gaming and demanding applications, and its 33W charging is a substantial upgrade over the A9 Pro's 10W. While the A9 Pro offers a lower entry price, the X3 Pro's benefits justify the cost difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi A9 Pro | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020. Released 2020 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.7 x 74.9 x 8.6 mm (6.25 x 2.95 x 0.34 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio P60 (12 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP*, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", AF 16 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens *32MP camera for the 64GB/4GB variant only | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 24 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, thermometer (skin temperature) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | 4150 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Onyx Black, Forest Green | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | - | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | - | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 112h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 453223 (v8) GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1) GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Umidigi A9 Pro
- Lower price point makes it accessible to budget-conscious buyers.
- Decent battery endurance for basic usage.
- Functional for everyday tasks like calling and texting.
- Significantly slower performance compared to the Poco X3 Pro.
- Slow 10W charging.
- Limited gaming capabilities.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 860 chipset for smooth gaming and multitasking.
- Fast 33W charging for quick top-ups.
- Likely superior camera performance due to better hardware.
- Higher price compared to the Umidigi A9 Pro.
- May experience some thermal throttling under sustained heavy load.
- Software updates may be less frequent than some other brands.
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like resolution, brightness, and panel type are missing for the Umidigi A9 Pro. The Poco X3 Pro, being a more premium offering, likely benefits from a higher peak brightness and potentially better color accuracy. Without further data on the A9 Pro, it's difficult to assess its display quality beyond basic functionality.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specifics are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details for either device, a direct comparison is challenging. However, given the Poco X3 Pro’s overall positioning, it likely incorporates a more advanced camera system with features like better low-light performance and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The A9 Pro likely relies on software processing to compensate for a less capable sensor. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on many phones in this price range is often a marketing gimmick, offering limited real-world benefit.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Poco X3 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7nm) is a substantial leap over the Umidigi A9 Pro’s MediaTek Helio P60 (12nm). The Snapdragon 860’s Kryo 485 cores, with a prime core clocked at 2.96 GHz, deliver significantly faster CPU and GPU performance. The 7nm process node also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Helio P60, while capable for basic tasks, will struggle with demanding games and multitasking. The architectural differences are stark: the Snapdragon 860 is a flagship-adjacent chip, while the Helio P60 is a mid-range processor from a previous generation.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 112 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Poco X3 Pro’s 33W wired charging can reach 59% in 30 minutes and 100% in 59 minutes, offering a significant convenience advantage. The Umidigi A9 Pro’s 10W charging is considerably slower, requiring much longer to fully recharge. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging of the Poco X3 Pro mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi A9 Pro if you need a basic smartphone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you prioritize gaming, multitasking, and faster charging speeds, and are willing to spend a bit more for a significantly improved user experience.