Umidigi A9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing smooth performance, a vibrant display, and reliable 5G connectivity, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset and 800 nit display significantly outperform the Umidigi A9 Pro’s Helio P60 and offer a more future-proof experience, despite the A9 Pro’s lower price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi A9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020. Released 2020 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.7 x 74.9 x 8.6 mm (6.25 x 2.95 x 0.34 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio P60 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP*, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", AF 16 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens *32MP camera for the 64GB/4GB variant only | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 24 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, thermometer (skin temperature) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 4150 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Onyx Black, Forest Green | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | - | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | - | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9) GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Umidigi A9 Pro
- Significantly lower price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Acceptable battery life (113h endurance)
- Outdated Helio P60 chipset
- Slow 10W charging
- Likely inferior display quality
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Powerful Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset
- Bright 800 nit display
- Fast 25W charging
- Higher price than the Umidigi A9 Pro
- Battery life is comparable, not superior
- May be overkill for very basic users
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 800 nits, compared to the Umidigi A9 Pro’s unspecified brightness. This difference is crucial for outdoor visibility. While both phones offer a 'Photo/Video' capable display, the A52s 5G’s higher brightness and infinite contrast ratio (nominal) will deliver a more vivid and engaging viewing experience. The A9 Pro’s display specifications are not detailed enough to assess its color accuracy or viewing angles, but given its price point, it’s unlikely to match the A52s 5G.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but the underlying hardware likely differs significantly. While detailed camera specs for the A9 Pro are missing, the A52s 5G benefits from Samsung’s image processing expertise. The A52s 5G likely features a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS), leading to better low-light performance and sharper images. The A9 Pro’s camera system is likely focused on affordability, potentially sacrificing image quality and features.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) is a modern, efficient chipset featuring a Cortex-A78 prime core clocked at 2.4 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Umidigi A9 Pro’s Mediatek Helio P60 (12nm), which utilizes older Cortex-A73 cores at 2.0 GHz. The 6nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 778G provides superior power efficiency and thermal management, resulting in sustained performance during demanding tasks. The A52s 5G’s CPU architecture, with its more advanced cores, will deliver significantly faster app launch times and smoother multitasking.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s 25W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Umidigi A9 Pro’s slow 10W charging. This means the A52s 5G can be rapidly topped up, minimizing downtime. While the A9 Pro might offer similar longevity on a single charge, the convenience of faster charging is a key benefit of the A52s 5G.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi A9 Pro if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. You’re accepting compromises in performance and display quality for significant cost savings. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you prioritize a responsive user experience, a brighter and more enjoyable display for media consumption, and the ability to handle demanding apps and games with ease. The A52s 5G is the better choice for users who want a phone that will last and perform well for several years.