Umidigi A9 Pro 2021 vs Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset, built on a more efficient 7nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Umidigi A9 Pro’s Helio P60. The faster 18W charging also offers a more convenient user experience, despite both phones achieving the same endurance rating.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi A9 Pro 2021 | Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021. Released 2021 | 2021, May 19 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, May 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.7 x 74.9 x 8.6 mm (6.25 x 2.95 x 0.34 in) | 161.8 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm (6.37 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ), 500 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio P60 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, MIUI 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", AF 16 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 24 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, thermometer (skin temperature) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 4150 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Onyx Black, Forest Green | Poco Yellow, Power Black, Cool Blue |
| Models | - | M2103K19PG, M2103K19PI, M2103K19PY |
| Price | - | About 140 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.94 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.54 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 121h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1475:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.9 LUFS (Good) |
Umidigi A9 Pro 2021
- Potentially lower purchase price
- Acceptable battery endurance
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Outdated Helio P60 chipset
- Slow 10W charging
- Less responsive user experience
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
- Faster and more efficient Dimensity 700 chipset
- 18W fast charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- 5G connectivity
- Slightly higher price point
- Camera performance likely average
- IPS LCD display (not OLED)
Display Comparison
Both devices feature similar contrast ratios around 1475:1, suggesting comparable image quality in terms of color depth. However, the Poco M3 Pro 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 536 nits, a significant advantage over the Umidigi A9 Pro’s unspecified brightness. This higher brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While neither manufacturer details panel technology (LTPO, AMOLED), the price point suggests both utilize IPS LCD panels, meaning viewing angles and color accuracy will be moderate.
Camera Comparison
Both phones list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size or image processing. Given the price bracket, expecting flagship-level camera performance is unrealistic. The absence of details suggests neither phone prioritizes camera quality as a key selling point. Any differences in image quality will likely stem from software processing rather than superior hardware. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco M3 Pro 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm) utilizes Cortex-A76 performance cores, offering a substantial architectural improvement over the Umidigi A9 Pro’s Helio P60 (12nm) and its Cortex-A73 cores. The 7nm process also contributes to better power efficiency, reducing thermal throttling during sustained workloads. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Dimensity 700’s configuration (2x2.2 GHz A76 + 6x2.0 GHz A55) is demonstrably faster than the Helio P60’s (4x2.0 GHz A73 + 4x2.0 GHz A53). This translates to quicker app launches, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive overall experience on the Poco.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both the Umidigi A9 Pro 2021 and the Poco M3 Pro 5G achieve an endurance rating of 121 hours. However, this doesn't tell the whole story. The Poco M3 Pro 5G supports 18W wired charging, significantly faster than the Umidigi A9 Pro’s 10W charging. This means the Poco can replenish its battery much quicker, minimizing downtime. While the battery capacity isn't specified for either device, the Dimensity 700’s superior power efficiency likely contributes to the similar endurance rating despite the faster charging and potentially smaller battery size.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi A9 Pro 2021 if you prioritize a potentially lower upfront cost and are comfortable with a less responsive user experience for basic tasks. Buy the Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G if you value smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and the benefits of a more modern and efficient 5G chipset, even if it means spending slightly more.