Umidigi A15T vs Xiaomi Redmi 12C: Which Budget Phone Delivers More Power?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and faster charging, the Umidigi A15T is the clear winner. Its Helio G95 chipset, featuring more powerful Cortex-A76 cores, provides a noticeable advantage in demanding tasks. While the Redmi 12C offers a respectable experience for basic use, the A15T’s superior processing power and 18W charging justify the potential price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi A15T | Xiaomi Redmi 12C |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2022, December 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024 | Available. Released 2023, January 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 167.6 x 75.3 x 8.6 mm (6.60 x 2.96 x 0.34 in) | 168.8 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.65 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1650 pixels (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1650 pixels (~268 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 106.2 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.71 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 500 nits | IPS LCD, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G95 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | eMMC 5.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF 0.08 MP (depth) |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Space Black, Nebula Purple, Glacier Blue | Graphite Gray, Ocean Blue, Mint Green, Lavender Purple |
| Models | - | 22120RN86G, 22120RN86I, 22126RN91Y, 2212ARNC4L |
| Price | About 180 EUR | £ 132.99 / € 107.41 |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 0.64 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Umidigi A15T
- More powerful Helio G95 chipset for better performance.
- Faster 18W wired charging.
- Potentially better image processing due to the chipset.
- May be slightly more expensive than the Redmi 12C.
- No information on display quality.
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
- Likely more affordable than the Umidigi A15T.
- Reliable performance for basic tasks.
- Xiaomi's established brand reputation.
- Slower Helio G85 chipset.
- Significantly slower 10W charging.
- Potentially limited performance in demanding apps.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity, but on functionality. Without specific display specs, we can assume similar resolutions and brightness levels. The real difference lies elsewhere.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, it’s safe to assume both phones feature a primary camera and potentially a depth or macro sensor. Given the price point, image quality will likely be adequate in good lighting conditions, but struggle in low light. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests reliance on software processing for stabilization. The focus should be on the main sensor resolution, which is not provided, but the chipset's ISP capabilities on the A15T may offer slightly better image processing.
Performance
The core distinction between these phones is the chipset. The Umidigi A15T’s Mediatek Helio G95 utilizes two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.05 GHz, paired with six Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration offers a significant performance boost over the Redmi 12C’s Helio G85, which features two Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores. The A76 architecture is demonstrably more efficient and powerful than the A75, translating to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. While both are 12nm chips, the architectural advantage of the G95 is key. The Redmi 12C will handle basic tasks adequately, but the A15T will show its strength in more demanding scenarios.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, but both likely fall in the 5000mAh range, typical for this segment. The critical difference is charging speed. The Umidigi A15T supports 18W wired charging, while the Redmi 12C is limited to 10W. This means the A15T will significantly reduce charging times, offering a more convenient user experience. A full charge on the Redmi 12C could easily take over 3 hours, while the A15T should be considerably faster.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi A15T if you need a phone capable of handling moderate gaming, multitasking, and benefit from quicker charging times. This phone is ideal for users who frequently switch between apps or enjoy mobile games. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 12C if you prioritize a simple, reliable experience for basic communication, social media, and light web browsing, and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a solid choice for first-time smartphone users or those on a very tight budget.