Umidigi A15T vs Samsung Galaxy A14: A Detailed Comparison for Budget Shoppers
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and gaming on a tight budget, the Umidigi A15T is the clear winner. Its Helio G95 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Galaxy A14’s Helio G80 variant. However, the Samsung Galaxy A14, particularly the Exynos 850 version, offers a more refined software experience and broader ecosystem support, making it a better choice for everyday users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi A15T | Samsung Galaxy A14 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2023, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024 | Available. Released 2023, March 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 167.6 x 75.3 x 8.6 mm (6.60 x 2.96 x 0.34 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1650 pixels (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 106.2 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 500 nits | PLS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version AOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version B |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G95 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version AExynos 850 (8 nm) - Version B |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1 or 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Space Black, Nebula Purple, Glacier Blue | Black, Dark Red, Silver, Green |
| Models | - | SM-A145F, SM-A145F/DSN, SM-A145M, SM-A145M/DS, SM-A145P, SM-A145R |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 85.76 / $ 147.60 / £ 79.95 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.46 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
Umidigi A15T
- More powerful Helio G95 chipset for better performance
- Faster 18W wired charging
- Potentially smoother gaming experience
- Less established brand reputation
- Software updates may be less frequent
Samsung Galaxy A14
- Samsung’s brand reliability and software support
- Potentially better battery efficiency (Exynos version)
- Familiar Android experience
- Helio G80 variant offers lower performance
- Slower 15W wired charging
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both utilize 12nm chipsets, suggesting similar power constraints impacting display capabilities. While specific display specs (resolution, brightness) are missing, the focus here is on processing power. The A14’s potential for a slightly more color-accurate panel, typical of Samsung’s displays, is offset by the A15T’s likely higher refresh rate potential given its more powerful chipset. Bezels are expected to be comparable in this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is difficult to assess without detailed sensor information. Both phones likely feature a primary camera accompanied by auxiliary lenses (often 2MP macro/depth sensors of limited utility). The A15T’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Helio G95 could translate to better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. Samsung’s image processing algorithms are generally well-regarded, but the A14’s chipset limitations may hinder its ability to fully leverage them. We expect similar video recording capabilities – likely 1080p at 30fps.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Umidigi A15T’s MediaTek Helio G95 (12nm) features a dual-core Cortex-A76 setup clocked at 2.05 GHz, paired with six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. This architecture is demonstrably more powerful than the Galaxy A14’s base Helio G80 (12nm) with its 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. The A14’s Exynos 850 (8nm) variant offers a potential advantage due to its smaller fabrication node, leading to improved efficiency and potentially sustained performance. However, the A76 cores in the G95 still provide a raw speed advantage. The A15T will likely exhibit smoother multitasking and faster app loading times. The A14’s Exynos version will likely have better thermal management.
Battery Life
Battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns. While specific battery capacities are unknown, the A14’s Exynos 850 variant, built on an 8nm process, will likely offer better battery efficiency than the A15T’s Helio G95. However, the A15T’s 18W charging is faster than the A14’s 15W charging, potentially offsetting any battery capacity differences. Expect both phones to comfortably last a full day with moderate use, but the A14 (Exynos) may stretch to a day and a half.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi A15T if you need a phone capable of handling moderate gaming and demanding apps without significant slowdowns, and are comfortable with a less polished software experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A14 if you prefer a familiar Android interface, value Samsung’s brand reliability, and prioritize a balanced experience over peak performance, especially if you opt for the Exynos 850 variant.