The Umidigi A15T and Realme C55 represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, but they diverge in their approach to performance and charging. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and faster charging, the Umidigi A15T is the better choice. Its Helio G95 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Realme C55’s Helio G88. However, the Realme C55’s 33W charging and comparable battery endurance make it a strong contender for those valuing convenience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2023, March 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024 | Available. Released 2023, March 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167.6 x 75.3 x 8.6 mm (6.60 x 2.96 x 0.34 in) | 165.6 x 75.9 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 189.5 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1650 pixels (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 106.2 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 500 nits | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 680 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G95 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes, 360˚ (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 50% in 29 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Space Black, Nebula Purple, Glacier Blue | Sun Shower, Rainy Night, Rainforest |
| Models | - | RMX3710 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | ₹ 8,399 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1264:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-31.8 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 257263 (v9)
GeekBench: 1452 (v5.1), 1413 (v6)
GFXBench: 9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Umidigi A15T
- Faster processor (Helio G95) for better performance
- More powerful CPU cores (Cortex-A76)
- Potentially better gaming experience
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Limited camera specification details
Realme C55
- Faster charging (33W with 29-minute 50% charge)
- Measured peak brightness of 659 nits
- Comparable battery endurance
- Less powerful processor (Helio G88)
- Older CPU core architecture (Cortex-A75)
Display Comparison
Both devices lack detailed display specifications beyond the Realme C55’s measured 659 nits peak brightness and 1264:1 contrast ratio. While the Realme C55’s brightness is a quantifiable advantage, the panel technology (IPS vs. AMOLED) and color accuracy remain unknown for both. The similar contrast ratios suggest comparable viewing experiences in terms of black levels. Without further data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner; however, the measured brightness gives the Realme C55 a slight edge.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image processing. This makes a direct comparison impossible. The absence of information suggests both likely employ budget-friendly camera setups. Without knowing the megapixel count or sensor size, it’s reasonable to assume image quality will be similar, relying heavily on software processing. The lack of detail makes it difficult to assess any meaningful difference.
Performance
The Umidigi A15T’s Mediatek Helio G95 chipset represents a clear advantage over the Realme C55’s Helio G88. The G95 utilizes two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.05 GHz, compared to the G88’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. The A76 architecture is more efficient and delivers better single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. While both are 12nm chips, the G95’s core configuration and higher clock speeds provide a noticeable performance boost, particularly in gaming. The Realme C55’s G88 is still capable for everyday tasks, but will exhibit more lag under sustained load.
Battery Life
Both the Umidigi A15T and Realme C55 achieve an endurance rating of 123 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Realme C55 distinguishes itself with 33W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 29 minutes. The Umidigi A15T is limited to 18W charging, meaning a significantly longer charge time. This difference in charging speed is a substantial convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi A15T if you frequently engage in mobile gaming, multitasking, or require a phone that feels responsive under heavy load. Its Helio G95 processor and Cortex-A76 cores offer a tangible performance advantage. Buy the Realme C55 if you prioritize a balanced experience with a focus on battery life and fast charging, and your usage primarily revolves around social media, communication, and light tasks. The 33W charging is a significant convenience factor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Umidigi A15T’s Helio G95 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile at high settings?
The Helio G95 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings, but sustained performance may vary depending on thermal throttling. The Cortex-A76 cores provide a performance boost over the G88, but it’s not a flagship-level chipset. Expect playable frame rates with some occasional dips during intense firefights.
❓ How much faster is the Realme C55’s 33W charging compared to the Umidigi A15T’s 18W charging in real-world use?
The Realme C55’s 33W charging can take a phone from 0% to 50% in approximately 29 minutes. The Umidigi A15T’s 18W charging will likely take over an hour to reach the same level. This difference is significant for users who need a quick power boost throughout the day.
❓ Does the Realme C55 support any form of fast charging protocols like PD or Quick Charge?
While Realme doesn't explicitly state support for specific protocols, the 33W charging suggests compatibility with proprietary Realme fast charging standards. It's unlikely to support full-speed PD or Quick Charge with third-party chargers, but will likely charge at a standard rate.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs on both phones a major concern?
Yes, it is. The absence of information regarding sensor size, aperture, and image processing makes it difficult to assess the camera quality. Both phones likely feature budget-friendly camera setups, and image quality will likely be adequate for casual use but won't compete with phones in higher price brackets.
